Daiwa Tanacom 500 vs Shimano Sedona FJ 2500FJX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa Tanacom 500
Multireels
70.40 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio2.8:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight750g / 26.46oz
Line retireve per crank46 centimeter / 18.11 inch
Ball bearings3
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €489.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size-
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.37/420

Shimano Sedona FJ
Spinning
63.90 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability7 out of 10
Ergonomics6.2 out of 10
Gear ratio5.0:1
Maximum drag9kg / 19.84lbs
Weight240g / 8.47oz
Line retireve per crank73 centimeter / 28.74 inch
Ball bearings3+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €52.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500FJ
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.25/160
Conclusion
Both Daiwa Tanacom 500 and Shimano Sedona FJ 2500FJX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Daiwa Tanacom 500 offers a durability of 9.5 out of 10, while Shimano Sedona FJ 2500FJX stands out for a weight of 240g / 8,47oz. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Daiwa Tanacom 500 and Shimano Sedona FJ?
Shimano Sedona FJ 2500FJX
- Thanks to its 6.33 out of 10 (5.0:1) gear ratio, the reel offers a strong balance between torque and quick retrieval
- With a score like 8.4 out of 10 (240g / 8,47oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- When it comes to retrieve speed, a score of 5.43 out of 10 (73 centimeter / 28.74 inch) means slower line pickup, great when you need more control for slower fishing styles
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (3+1) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000S-CX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 12IIX


Shimano Ocea Jigger 4000 HGX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000D-CX


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000D-CX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 12IIX


Shimano Ocea Jigger 4000 HGX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX


Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX vs Shimano Torium 30HGA / Right handX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 12IIX vs Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 3000-CXHX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX


Abu GARCIA Zenon 4000 SHX vs Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 3000-CXHX


Shimano Tekota 600 Line Counter A 600 HGA LC / Right handX vs Shimano Sedona FJ C3000HGFJX


Shimano Tiagra 50AX vs Daiwa RX LT 2000X


Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A vs Shimano Tekota 600 Line Counter A 600 HGA LC / Right handX


Delphin IXTREK 5000X vs Shimano Vanquish FC 4000MHGCX


Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A vs Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 3000-CXHX vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000S-CX


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000S-CX vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2500D(U)X


Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX


Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX vs Shimano Sedona FJ C3000HGFJX


Shimano Tekota 600 Line Counter A 600 HGA LC / Right handX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000D-CX


Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 3000-CXHX


Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 3000-CXHX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX
