Daiwa Tanacom 500 vs Shimano Sienna 2500X
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa Tanacom 500
Multireels
70.40 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio2.8:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight750g / 26.46oz
Line retireve per crank46 centimeter / 18.11 inch
Ball bearings3
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €489.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size-
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.37/420

Shimano Sienna
Spinning
51.60 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.62 out of 10
Ergonomics6.17 out of 10
Gear ratio5.0:1
Maximum drag4kg / 8.82lbs
Weight250g / 8.82oz
Line retireve per crank71 centimeter / 27.95 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €27.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.25/160
Conclusion
Daiwa Tanacom 500 edges out Shimano Sienna 2500X with slightly better overall performance, especially on the durability (9.5 out of 10) and the total score (7.04 out of 10). Still, Shimano Sienna 2500X holds its own with strengths like a weight of 250g / 8,82oz and a ball bearings of 4, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Daiwa Tanacom 500 and Shimano Sienna?
Daiwa Tanacom 500
- Ready for saltwater, great for any multireels adventure.
Shimano Sienna 2500X
- Thanks to its 6.33 out of 10 (5.0:1) gear ratio, the reel offers a strong balance between torque and quick retrieval
- With a score like 8.33 out of 10 (250g / 8,82oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- When it comes to retrieve speed, a score of 5.14 out of 10 (71 centimeter / 27.95 inch) means slower line pickup, great when you need more control for slower fishing styles
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (4) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT 2000 S-XHX vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT PC 2500X


Daiwa TANACOM 800X vs Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS


Shimano Stradic GTM 4000S RC Spinning reel with fighting drag vs Shimano Torium 50HGA / Right HandX


Daiwa BG 3000X vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW-Right handX


Daiwa Ninja LT 5000-CX vs Penn International VISW 30 / Color: GoldX


Shimano Tekota 600 Line Counter A 600 HGA LC / Right handX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 16IIX


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 3000X vs Shimano Stradic GTM 4000S RC Spinning reel with fighting drag


Shimano Torium 50HGA / Right HandX vs Daiwa Ninja LT 5000-CX


Shimano Stradic GTM 4000S RC Spinning reel with fighting drag vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT PC 2500X


Shimano Tekota 600 Line Counter A 600 HGA LC / Right handX vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW-Right handX


Shimano TWIN POWER FD C3000MHG vs Penn International VISW 30 / Color: GoldX


Penn International VISW 30 / Color: GoldX vs Shimano Cardiff 201A


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW-Right handX vs Shimano Torium 50HGA / Right HandX


Delphin ELIXIR 3000X vs Daiwa BG 3000X


Shimano Torium 50HGA / Right HandX vs Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS


Shimano Stradic GTM 4000S RC Spinning reel with fighting drag vs Shimano Cardiff 201A


Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 4000-CX vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW-Right handX


Penn International VISW 30 / Color: GoldX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 16IIX


Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT 2000 S-XHX vs Shimano Tekota 600 Line Counter A 600 HGA LC / Right handX


Daiwa Ninja LT 5000-CX vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW-Right handX
