Daiwa Tanacom 500 vs Shimano Stella FK 2500 SX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa Tanacom 500
Multireels
70.40 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio2.8:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight750g / 26.46oz
Line retireve per crank46 centimeter / 18.11 inch
Ball bearings3
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €489.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size-
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.37/420

Shimano Stella FK
Spinning
87.30 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.32 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag4kg / 8.82lbs
Weight205g / 7.23oz
Line retireve per crank70 centimeter / 27.56 inch
Ball bearings12+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €593.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500 S
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 120/0.12
Conclusion
Shimano Stella FK 2500 SX edges out Daiwa Tanacom 500 with slightly better overall performance, especially on the weight (205g / 7,23oz) and the gear ratio (5.1:1). Still, Daiwa Tanacom 500 holds its own with strengths like a maximum drag of 10kg / 22,05lbs and a durability of 9.5 out of 10, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Daiwa Tanacom 500 and Shimano Stella FK?
Shimano Stella FK 2500 SX
- Thanks to its 7 out of 10 (5.1:1) gear ratio, the reel offers a strong balance between torque and quick retrieval
- With a score like 8.63 out of 10 (205g / 7,23oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- When it comes to retrieve speed, a score of 5 out of 10 (70 centimeter / 27.56 inch) means slower line pickup, great when you need more control for slower fishing styles
Similar comparisons

Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW-Right handX


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 5000D-CXHX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 16IIX


Shimano Tiagra 130AX vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LC-Right handX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 16IIX vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LC-Right handX


Delphin CarbonIX 1000X vs Shimano Tiagra 50AX


Shimano Tiagra 50AX vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW-Right handX


Daiwa BG 2000X vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW-Right handX


Mitchell 300 4000X vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 5000D-CXHX


Daiwa BG 2000X vs Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW-Right handX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX


Shimano TLD II A 20 IIX vs Shimano Tiagra 130AX


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 5000D-CXHX vs Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500-XHX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX


Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000S-HX


Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 16IIX vs Shimano TLD II A 20 IIX


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 5000D-CXHX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000S-HX


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000S-HX vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 6000X


Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 3000-CX vs Shimano TORIUM 40 PGAX


Shimano Tiagra 130AX vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW-Right handX
