Daiwa Tanacom 500 vs Shimano Stella FK 4000 MX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa Tanacom 500
Multireels
70.40 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio2.8:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight750g / 26.46oz
Line retireve per crank46 centimeter / 18.11 inch
Ball bearings3
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €489.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size-
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.37/420

Shimano Stella FK
Spinning
95.00 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.13 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag11kg / 24.25lbs
Weight260g / 9.17oz
Line retireve per crank87 centimeter / 34.25 inch
Ball bearings12+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €599.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000 M
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 120/0.12
Conclusion
Shimano Stella FK 4000 MX clearly outshines Daiwa Tanacom 500, offering significantly better performance in line retrieve per crank (87 centimeter / 34.25 inch) and gear ratio (5.3:1). While Daiwa Tanacom 500 may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Shimano Stella FK 4000 MX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Daiwa Tanacom 500 and Shimano Stella FK?
Shimano Stella FK 4000 MX
- The reel brings in line quickly with its 8.2 out of 10 (5.3:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
- With a score like 8.27 out of 10 (260g / 9,17oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- 8.2 out of 10 (87 centimeter / 34.25 inch) in line retrieve, means it picks up line fast, very handy when chasing quick fish
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 2500-XHX vs Delphin ELIXIR 5000X


Shimano Talica 25II CAM 25II CAMX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX


Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT 2500 S-XHX vs Shimano Tekota 500 HGA / Right handX


Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT 2500 S-XHX vs Daiwa Tanacom 750


Shimano Tiagra 50AX vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 2500-XHX


Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX vs Delphin IXPERA 2000X


Shimano Tiagra 50AX vs Shimano Cardiff 401A


Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX vs Daiwa Ninja LT 6000X


Shimano Tiagra 50AX vs Daiwa Ninja LT 6000X


Delphin IXPERA 2000X vs Shimano Talica 25II CAM 25II CAMX


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 2500-XHX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX


Shimano Tyrnos 30 II vs Shimano Cardiff 401A


Daiwa Tanacom 750 vs Shimano Tiagra 50AX


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 2500-XHX vs Penn Battle III 2000X


Shimano Torium 14HGA / Right handX vs Shimano Tyrnos 30 II


Shimano Tekota 500 HGA / Right handX vs Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 3000-CX


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW-Right handX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX


Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 3000-CX vs Delphin ELIXIR 5000X


Shimano Tyrnos 30 II vs Shimano Tiagra 50AX


Delphin ELIXIR 5000X vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW-Right handX
