Daiwa Tanacom 500 vs Shimano Twin Power FD 4000PGX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa Tanacom 500
Multireels
70.40 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio2.8:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight750g / 26.46oz
Line retireve per crank46 centimeter / 18.11 inch
Ball bearings3
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €489.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size-
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.37/420

Shimano Twin Power FD
Spinning
66.20 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.56 out of 10
Ergonomics6.08 out of 10
Gear ratio4.4:1
Maximum drag11kg / 24.25lbs
Weight275g / 9.7oz
Line retireve per crank72 centimeter / 28.35 inch
Ball bearings10
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €389.80
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000PG
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.3/180
Conclusion
Both Daiwa Tanacom 500 and Shimano Twin Power FD 4000PGX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Daiwa Tanacom 500 offers a durability of 9.5 out of 10, while Shimano Twin Power FD 4000PGX stands out for a weight of 275g / 9,7oz. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Daiwa Tanacom 500 and Shimano Twin Power FD?
Daiwa Tanacom 500
- Ready for saltwater, great for any multireels adventure.
Shimano Twin Power FD 4000PGX
- With a score like 8.17 out of 10 (275g / 9,7oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- When it comes to retrieve speed, a score of 5.29 out of 10 (72 centimeter / 28.35 inch) means slower line pickup, great when you need more control for slower fishing styles
Similar comparisons

Shimano Twin Power FD C3000X vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 1000X


Shimano Torium 30PGAX vs Shimano Vanquish FC 4000XGCX


Shimano 21 Sustain 4000 FJX vs Daiwa TANACOM 1200X


Shimano Tiagra 50AX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000S-HX


Penn FIERCE IV 2000X vs Daiwa Freams LT 6000D-HX


Mitchell 300 4000X vs Daiwa Freams LT 6000D-HX


Shimano Torium 30PGAX vs Penn FIERCE IV 2000X


Daiwa Freams LT 6000D-HX vs Shimano TLD II A 20 IIX


Penn FIERCE IV 2000X vs Daiwa 23 LEOBRITZ 300 JL


Shimano Tiagra 50AX vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LC-Right handX


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 1000X vs Mitchell 300 4000X


Shimano Torium 30PGAX vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2000X


Daiwa TANACOM 1200X vs Shimano Talica 20II CAM 20II CAMX


Shimano Vanquish FC 4000XGCX vs Mitchell 300 4000X


Shimano TLD II A 20 IIX vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LC-Right handX


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LC-Right handX vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 1000X


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LC-Right handX vs Shimano Torium 20HGA / Right handX


Penn FIERCE IV 2000X vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2000X


Penn FIERCE IV 2000X vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000S-HX


Shimano Torium 30PGAX vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LC-Right handX
