Daiwa Tanacom 500 vs Shimano Twin Power FD 4000X
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa Tanacom 500
Multireels
70.40 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio2.8:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight750g / 26.46oz
Line retireve per crank46 centimeter / 18.11 inch
Ball bearings3
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €489.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size-
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.37/420

Shimano Twin Power FD
Spinning
92.00 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.56 out of 10
Ergonomics6.1 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag11kg / 24.25lbs
Weight270g / 9.52oz
Line retireve per crank87 centimeter / 34.25 inch
Ball bearings10
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €389.80
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.3/180
Conclusion
Shimano Twin Power FD 4000X clearly outshines Daiwa Tanacom 500, offering significantly better performance in line retrieve per crank (87 centimeter / 34.25 inch) and gear ratio (5.3:1). While Daiwa Tanacom 500 may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Shimano Twin Power FD 4000X is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Daiwa Tanacom 500 and Shimano Twin Power FD?
Daiwa Tanacom 500
- Ready for saltwater, great for any multireels adventure.
Shimano Twin Power FD 4000X
- The reel brings in line quickly with its 8.2 out of 10 (5.3:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
- With a score like 8.2 out of 10 (270g / 9,52oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- 8.2 out of 10 (87 centimeter / 34.25 inch) in line retrieve, means it picks up line fast, very handy when chasing quick fish
Similar comparisons

Shimano TLD II A 50 II LRSAX vs Shimano Beastmaster


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000-XHX vs Shimano Talica 25II CAM 25II CAMX


Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 2500D-XHX vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 3000-CXHX


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 1000DX vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 3000-CXHX


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000-XHX vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 2500D-XHX


Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 S x vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 2500D-XHX


Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 3000-CXHX


Delphin CarbonIX 2000X vs Shimano Talica II 16IIAX


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000-XHX vs Shimano FX 2500 HG FCX


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT PC 2500X vs Shimano Ocea Jigger 4000 HGX


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 1000X vs Shimano TLD II A 50 II LRSAX


Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX vs Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 S x


Shimano Tiagra 50WAX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 1000DX


Shimano Talica II 16IIAX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 1000DX


Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 3000-CX vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 1000X


Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 3000-CX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000-XHX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX


Penn International VISW 80 / Color: GoldX vs Shimano Talica II 16IIAX


Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 S x vs Delphin CarbonIX 2000X


Delphin CarbonIX 2000X vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000-XHX
