Daiwa Tanacom 500 vs Shimano Twin Power FE 4000MFEX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa Tanacom 500
Multireels
70.40 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio2.8:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight750g / 26.46oz
Line retireve per crank46 centimeter / 18.11 inch
Ball bearings3
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €489.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size-
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.37/420

Shimano Twin Power FE
Spinning
92.20 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.57 out of 10
Ergonomics6.13 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag11kg / 24.25lbs
Weight260g / 9.17oz
Line retireve per crank87 centimeter / 34.25 inch
Ball bearings9+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €396.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000MFE
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.3/120
Conclusion
Shimano Twin Power FE 4000MFEX clearly outshines Daiwa Tanacom 500, offering significantly better performance in line retrieve per crank (87 centimeter / 34.25 inch) and gear ratio (5.3:1). While Daiwa Tanacom 500 may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Shimano Twin Power FE 4000MFEX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Daiwa Tanacom 500 and Shimano Twin Power FE?
Daiwa Tanacom 500
- Ready for saltwater, great for any multireels adventure.
Shimano Twin Power FE 4000MFEX
- The reel brings in line quickly with its 8.2 out of 10 (5.3:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
- With a score like 8.27 out of 10 (260g / 9,17oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- 8.2 out of 10 (87 centimeter / 34.25 inch) in line retrieve, means it picks up line fast, very handy when chasing quick fish
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 5000D-CXHX vs Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A


Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QC 750X vs Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 2500D-XH 2500D-XHX


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500-XHX vs Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QC 750X


Daiwa 24 TANACOM S 500J (U) vs Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 2500D-XH 2500D-XHX


Shimano FX 4000 FCX vs Shimano Talica II 16IIAX


Daiwa Ninja LT 5000-CX vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 5000D-CXHX


Daiwa 24 SALTIGA L vs Shimano Complex XR 2500 HGX


Daiwa 24 TANACOM S 500J (U) vs Daiwa Ninja LT 5000-CX


Shimano Talica 20II CAM 20II CAMX vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 2500D-XHX


Shimano Ocea Jigger 4000 HGX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500-XHX


Shimano Tiagra 16X vs Shimano FX 4000 FCX


Shimano TLD II A 50 IIX vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 5000D-CXHX


Shimano Talica 25II CAM 25II CAMX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500-XHX


Shimano Talica II 16IIAX vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 2500DX


Shimano Talica II 16IIAX vs Daiwa Ninja LT 5000-CX


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500-XHX vs Daiwa 24 SALTIGA L


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CX vs Shimano Tiagra 16X


Daiwa 24 SALTIGA L vs Shimano Tiagra 16X


Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A vs Shimano Tiagra 16X


Shimano Talica 25II CAM 25II CAMX vs Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 2500D-XH 2500D-XHX
