Daiwa Tanacom 500 vs Shimano Ultegra C3000XGDX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa Tanacom 500
Multireels
70.40 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio2.8:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight750g / 26.46oz
Line retireve per crank46 centimeter / 18.11 inch
Ball bearings3
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €489.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size-
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.37/420

Shimano Ultegra
Spinning
75.80 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.27 out of 10
Gear ratio6.4:1
Maximum drag9kg / 19.84lbs
Weight220g / 7.76oz
Line retireve per crank94 centimeter / 37.01 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €132.00
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizeC3000XGD
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.3/130
Conclusion
Both Daiwa Tanacom 500 and Shimano Ultegra C3000XGDX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Daiwa Tanacom 500 offers a durability of 9.5 out of 10, while Shimano Ultegra C3000XGDX stands out for a line retrieve per crank of 94 centimeter / 37.01 inch. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Daiwa Tanacom 500 and Shimano Ultegra?
Shimano Ultegra C3000XGDX
- With a score like 8.53 out of 10 (220g / 7,76oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- 8.9 out of 10 (94 centimeter / 37.01 inch) in line retrieve, means it picks up line fast, very handy when chasing quick fish
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Similar comparisons

Shimano Tiagra 30WLRSAX vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 5000D-CXHX


Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX vs Shimano Cardiff 301A


Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 2500X vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 8IIX


Shimano Talica II 16IIAX vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 5000D-CXHX


Shimano Tiagra 30WLRSAX vs Shimano Complex XR 2500 HGX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 8IIX vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 5000D-CXHX


Shimano Tiagra 30WLRSAX vs Shimano Torium 40HGA / Right HandX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 8IIX vs Shimano Cardiff 301A


Shimano Talica II 16IIAX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 8IIX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 12IIX


Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 5000D-CXHX


Daiwa 20 Airity LT 3000CXHX vs Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 2500X


Shimano Torium 20PGAX vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 5000D-CXHX


Mitchell 308 PRO 2000X vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 8IIX


Mitchell 308 PRO 2000X vs Shimano Complex XR 2500 HGX


Penn International VISW 30 / Color: GoldX vs Shimano Complex XR 2500 HGX


Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 4000-CX vs Shimano Torium 40HGA / Right HandX


Shimano Talica II 16IIAX vs Shimano Tiagra 30WLRSAX


Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 4000-CX vs Shimano Complex XR 2500 HGX


Shimano Cardiff 301A vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 4000D-CX
