Daiwa Tanacom 500 vs Shimano Sahara 2500 DH R
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa Tanacom 500
Multireels
70.40 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio2.8:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight750g / 26.46oz
Line retireve per crank46 centimeter / 18.11 inch
Ball bearings3
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €489.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size-
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.37/420

Shimano Sahara 2500 DH R
Spinning
29.70 out of 100
Value for money2.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.99 out of 10
Ergonomics2 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag2kg / 4.41 lbs
Weight320g / 11.29oz
Line retireve per crank76cm / 29.92 inch
Ball bearings3 S SUS + 1 Rollerbearing
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €49.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500 DH
- Handle typeDouble handle
- Drag typeRead drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/m: 0.18/290. 0.20/240, 0.25/160
Conclusion
Daiwa Tanacom 500 clearly outshines Shimano Sahara 2500 DH R, offering significantly better performance in durability (9.5 out of 10) and total score (7.04 out of 10). While Shimano Sahara 2500 DH R may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa Tanacom 500 is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Daiwa Tanacom 500 and Shimano Sahara 2500 DH R?
Daiwa Tanacom 500
- A drag score of 6.03 out of 10 (10kg / 22,05lbs) means you’re covered for most average carp battles without overthinking it
- Ready for saltwater, great for any multireels adventure.
Shimano Sahara 2500 DH R
- The reel brings in line quickly with its 8 out of 10 (5.2:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
- When it comes to retrieve speed, a score of 5.86 out of 10 (76cm / 29.92 inch) means slower line pickup, great when you need more control for slower fishing styles
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (3 S SUS + 1 Rollerbearing) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Similar comparisons

Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS vs Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 500X


Daiwa Sealine Ishidai H vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 12IIX


Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS vs Shimano Torium 40HGA / Right HandX


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW-Right handX vs Shimano Vanford FA C3000HGAX


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW-Right handX vs Shimano TLD II A 50 IIX


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW-Right handX vs Shimano Torium 40HGA / Right HandX


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LC-Right handX vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2500(U)X


Shimano Vanford FA C3000SDHAX vs Daiwa 23 LEOBRITZ 300 JL


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 20IIX vs Shimano Vanford FA C3000HGAX


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000X vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LC-Right handX


Shimano Sedona FJ C3000FJX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 12IIX


Daiwa 23 LEOBRITZ 300 JL vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LC-Right handX


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW-Right handX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 20IIX


Shimano Torium 40HGA / Right HandX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 20IIX


Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 500X vs Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 5000X


Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 500X vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 25IIX


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2500(U)X vs Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 500X


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT PC 2500DX vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LC-Right handX


Daiwa 23 LEOBRITZ 300 JL vs Shimano TLD II A 50 IIX


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT PC 2500DX vs Shimano Vanford FA C3000HGAX
