Daiwa Tanacom 500 vs Shimano Sahara 4000 R
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa Tanacom 500
Multireels
70.40 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio2.8:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight750g / 26.46oz
Line retireve per crank46 centimeter / 18.11 inch
Ball bearings3
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €489.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size-
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.37/420

Shimano Sahara 4000 R
Spinning
42.30 out of 100
Value for money2.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability3 out of 10
Ergonomics2 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag3 kg / 6.61 lbs
Weight335g / 11.82oz
Line retireve per crank82cm / 32.28 inch
Ball bearings3 S SUS + 1 Rollerbearing
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €50.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeRead drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/m: 0.25/260. 0.30/180, 0.35/130
Conclusion
Daiwa Tanacom 500 clearly outshines Shimano Sahara 4000 R, offering significantly better performance in durability (9.5 out of 10) and total score (7.04 out of 10). While Shimano Sahara 4000 R may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa Tanacom 500 is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Daiwa Tanacom 500 and Shimano Sahara 4000 R?
Daiwa Tanacom 500
- Ready for saltwater, great for any multireels adventure.
Shimano Sahara 4000 R
- Thanks to its 7 out of 10 (5.1:1) gear ratio, the reel offers a strong balance between torque and quick retrieval
- 6.71 out of 10 (82cm / 32.28 inch) in line retrieve, means the reel delivers a steady and reliable retrieve which is ideal for most everyday techniques
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (3 S SUS + 1 Rollerbearing) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Similar comparisons

Shimano FX 2500 FCX vs Shimano Torium 16PGAX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 16IIX vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 3000-CXHX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 16IIX vs Shimano Tiagra 50WLRSAX


Shimano 21 Sustain 4000 FJX vs Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 2500X


Shimano FX 2500 FCX vs Shimano 21 Sustain 4000 FJX


Shimano Tekota 501 HGA / Left-handedX vs Shimano Torium 16HGA / Right handX


Shimano 21 Sustain 3000 FJX vs Shimano Torium 16HGA / Right handX


Shimano Beastmaster vs Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT3000-CX vs Shimano Tiagra 130AX


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 3000X vs Shimano 21 Sustain 3000 FJX


Daiwa Crossfire LT 5000-CX vs Shimano Torium 16HGA / Right handX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 16IIX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT3000-CX


Shimano FX 2500 FCX vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 3000X


Shimano 21 Sustain 4000 FJX vs Shimano Tiagra 50WLRSAX


Shimano Tekota 501 HGA / Left-handedX vs Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 2500X


Shimano Torium 16PGAX vs Shimano Tiagra 50WLRSAX


Daiwa TANACOM 1200X vs Shimano Tiagra 50WLRSAX


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 3000-CXHX vs Daiwa 24 SALTIGA L


Shimano 21 Sustain 2500 FJX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT3000-CX


Shimano Torium 16PGAX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX
