Daiwa Tanacom 750 vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 4000D-CX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa Tanacom 750
Multireels
77.00 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio2.3:1
Maximum drag20kg / 44.09lbs
Weight1260g / 44.45oz
Line retireve per crank42 centimeter / 16.54 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €511.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size-
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.41/700

Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT
Spinning
95.00 out of 100
Value for money5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.23 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight230g / 8.11oz
Line retireve per crank82 centimeter / 32.28 inch
Ball bearings8
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €218.10
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000D-C
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.37/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 4000D-CX edges out Daiwa Tanacom 750 with slightly better overall performance, especially on the ball bearings (8) and the gear ratio (5.2:1). Still, Daiwa Tanacom 750 holds its own with strengths like a durability of 9.5 out of 10 and a maximum drag of 20kg / 44,09lbs, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Daiwa Tanacom 750 and Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT?
Daiwa Tanacom 750
- Ready for saltwater, great for any multireels adventure.
Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 4000D-CX
- The reel brings in line quickly with its 8 out of 10 (5.2:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
- With a score like 8.47 out of 10 (230g / 8,11oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- 6.71 out of 10 (82 centimeter / 32.28 inch) in line retrieve, means the reel delivers a steady and reliable retrieve which is ideal for most everyday techniques
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2000D(U)X vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 4000DX


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500DX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 10IIX


Shimano TORIUM 40 PGAX vs Delphin FRIZ


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 3000-CX vs Shimano Stella FK C 5000 XGX


Shimano Stella FK C 5000 XGX vs Daiwa TANACOM 800X


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000D-CXHX vs Shimano Stella FK C 5000 XGX


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000D-CXHX vs Delphin FRIZ


Shimano Tiagra 50WAX vs Shimano Exsence 4000 MXGAX


Daiwa TANACOM 800X vs Shimano Beastmaster


Shimano TORIUM 40 PGAX vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 4000D-CX


Shimano Beastmaster vs Shimano Tiagra 50WAX


Shimano Exsence 4000 MXGAX vs Shimano Tiagra 50AX


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 3000-CX vs Delphin FRIZ


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 8IIX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX


Shimano Exsence 4000 MXGAX vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2000D(U)X


Shimano Cardiff 201A vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 10IIX


Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 10IIX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 10IIX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX


Daiwa TANACOM 800X vs Shimano Stella FK C 5000 XGX


Shimano Beastmaster vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 10IIX
