Daiwa Tanacom 750 vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2000 S-HX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa Tanacom 750
Multireels
77.00 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio2.3:1
Maximum drag20kg / 44.09lbs
Weight1260g / 44.45oz
Line retireve per crank42 centimeter / 16.54 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €511.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size-
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.41/700

Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT
Spinning
80.00 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.66 out of 10
Ergonomics6.42 out of 10
Gear ratio5.8:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs
Weight175g / 6.17oz
Line retireve per crank76 centimeter / 29.92 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €199.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2000 S-H
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.14/150
Conclusion
Both Daiwa Tanacom 750 and Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2000 S-HX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Daiwa Tanacom 750 offers a durability of 9.5 out of 10, while Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2000 S-HX stands out for a gear ratio of 5.8:1. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Daiwa Tanacom 750 and Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT?
Daiwa Tanacom 750
- Ready for saltwater, great for any multireels adventure.
Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2000 S-HX
- A fast gear ratio of 9.2 out of 10 (5.8:1), means the reel is built for speed and it's perfect for active retrieves, and quick follow ups
- With a score like 8.83 out of 10 (175g / 6,17oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- When it comes to retrieve speed, a score of 5.86 out of 10 (76 centimeter / 29.92 inch) means slower line pickup, great when you need more control for slower fishing styles
Similar comparisons

Shimano Talica 25II CAM 25II CAMX vs Shimano 21 Sustain 2500 HGFJX


Daiwa RX LT 2500X vs Shimano Torium 20HGA / Right handX


Shimano Torium 30PGAX vs Daiwa Freams LT 2500DX


Shimano TLD II A 50 IIX vs Daiwa TANASENSOR


Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 3000D-CX vs Daiwa RX LT 2500X


Shimano Torium 30PGAX vs Shimano Torium 20HGA / Right handX


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 4000-CX vs Delphin ELIXIR 3000X


Shimano TORIUM 40 PGAX vs Shimano Torium 30PGAX


Shimano Twin Power FE 4000MHGFEX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 3000-HX


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 3000-CXHX vs Shimano Ocea Jigger 4000 HGX


Delphin ELIXIR 3000X vs Penn International VISW 30 / Color: GoldX


Shimano Torium 20HGA / Right handX vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 4000-CX vs Shimano 21 Sustain 2500 HGFJX


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 4000-CX vs Shimano Torium 20HGA / Right handX


Shimano Ocea Jigger 4000 HGX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 3000-CXHX


Shimano Twin Power FE 4000MHGFEX vs Shimano Torium 20HGA / Right handX


Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 3000D-CX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 3000-CXHX


Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX vs Daiwa Freams LT 2500DX


Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX vs Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 3000D-CX


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 3000-CX vs Penn International VISW 30 / Color: GoldX
