Daiwa Tanacom 750 vs Penn FIERCE IV 2500X
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa Tanacom 750
Multireels
77.00 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio2.3:1
Maximum drag20kg / 44.09lbs
Weight1260g / 44.45oz
Line retireve per crank42 centimeter / 16.54 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €511.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size-
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.41/700

Penn FIERCE IV
Spinning
68.90 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability7 out of 10
Ergonomics6.07 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag5.5kg / 12,13lbs
Weight280g / 9.88oz
Line retireve per crank84 centimeter / 33.07 inch
Ball bearings4+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €65.70
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.23/235
Conclusion
Both Daiwa Tanacom 750 and Penn FIERCE IV 2500X perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Daiwa Tanacom 750 offers a maximum drag of 20kg / 44,09lbs, while Penn FIERCE IV 2500X stands out for a gear ratio of 6.2:1. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Daiwa Tanacom 750 and Penn FIERCE IV?
Penn FIERCE IV 2500X
- A fast gear ratio of 10 out of 10 (6.2:1), means the reel is built for speed and it's perfect for active retrieves, and quick follow ups
- With a score like 8.13 out of 10 (280g / 9,88oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- 7 out of 10 (84 centimeter / 33.07 inch) in line retrieve, means the reel delivers a steady and reliable retrieve which is ideal for most everyday techniques
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000-CX vs Shimano TALICA II A 20IIAX


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW-Right handX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000-CX


Shimano Talica 25II CAM 25II CAMX vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 4000D-CX


Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 2000D-XH 2000D-XHX vs Daiwa Ninja LT 2500-XHX


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000-CX vs Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000-CX vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW-Right handX


Daiwa Ninja LT 2500-XHX vs Shimano TALICA II A 20IIAX


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW-Right handX vs Shimano Beastmaster


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 8IIX vs Daiwa TANACOM 1200X


Daiwa 23 LEOBRITZ 300 JL vs Daiwa Ninja LT 2500X


Shimano Beastmaster vs Daiwa TANACOM 1200X


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 2500X


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 4000D-CX vs Daiwa 23 LEOBRITZ 300 JL


Daiwa Sweepfire E 1500C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW-Right handX


Shimano Talica 25II CAM 25II CAMX vs Shimano 20 Stella 6000 PGX


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW-Right handX vs Shimano Talica 25II CAM 25II CAMX


Shimano TORIUM 40 PGAX vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 2000S-PX


Shimano Beastmaster vs Shimano 20 Stella 6000 PGX


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000-CX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 3000FEX


Daiwa Sweepfire E 1500C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 4000D-CX
