Daiwa Tanacom 750 vs Shimano FX 2500 FCX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa Tanacom 750
Multireels
77.00 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio2.3:1
Maximum drag20kg / 44.09lbs
Weight1260g / 44.45oz
Line retireve per crank42 centimeter / 16.54 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €511.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size-
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.41/700

Shimano FX
Spinning
48.60 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.17 out of 10
Gear ratio5.0:1
Maximum drag4kg / 8.82lbs
Weight250g / 8.82oz
Line retireve per crank71 centimeter / 27.95 inch
Ball bearings3
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €18.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500 FC
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.25/160
Conclusion
Daiwa Tanacom 750 clearly outshines Shimano FX 2500 FCX, offering significantly better performance in durability (9.5 out of 10) and maximum drag (20kg / 44,09lbs). While Shimano FX 2500 FCX may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa Tanacom 750 is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Daiwa Tanacom 750 and Shimano FX?
Daiwa Tanacom 750
- Ready for saltwater, great for any multireels adventure.
Shimano FX 2500 FCX
- Thanks to its 6.33 out of 10 (5.0:1) gear ratio, the reel offers a strong balance between torque and quick retrieval
- With a score like 8.33 out of 10 (250g / 8,82oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- When it comes to retrieve speed, a score of 5.14 out of 10 (71 centimeter / 27.95 inch) means slower line pickup, great when you need more control for slower fishing styles
Similar comparisons

Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX vs Daiwa Crossfire LT 4000-CX


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LC-Right handX vs Shimano Twin Power FD C3000X


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LC-Right handX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX


Daiwa Crossfire LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT2000X


Delphin ELIXIR 2000X vs Daiwa Fuego LT 3000D-CX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT2000X vs Delphin ELIXIR 2000X


Shimano Tekota 500 HGA LCM / Right handX vs Shimano Talica II 16IIAX


Penn International VISW 30 / Color: GoldX vs Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 2000X


Shimano Tekota 600 HGA LCM / Right handX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 2000 / JB4 0.13MM YELOW 2000X


Shimano Tekota 500 HGA LCM / Right handX vs Daiwa Ninja LT 6000X


Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 2000X vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 3000-CXH(U)X


Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 2000 / JB4 0.13MM YELOW 2000X


Shimano Torium 16HGA / Right handX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 2000 / JB4 0.13MM YELOW 2000X


Daiwa Crossfire LT 4000-CX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 3000-CXH(U)X vs Daiwa Fuego LT 3000D-CX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 20IIX vs Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 2000X


Daiwa Crossfire LT 4000-CX vs Shimano Complex XR 2500 HGX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 25IIX vs Penn International VISW 30 / Color: GoldX


Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 25IIX


Shimano Tekota 600 HGA LCM / Right handX vs Daiwa Ninja LT 6000X
