Daiwa Tanacom 750 vs Shimano Twin Power XD A C 3000 XGX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa Tanacom 750
Multireels
77.00 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio2.3:1
Maximum drag20kg / 44.09lbs
Weight1260g / 44.45oz
Line retireve per crank42 centimeter / 16.54 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €511.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size-
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.41/700

Shimano Twin Power XD A
Spinning
82.90 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.33 out of 10
Gear ratio6.4:1
Maximum drag9kg / 19.84lbs
Weight200g / 7.05oz
Line retireve per crank94 centimeter / 37.01 inch
Ball bearings11
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €359.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizeC 3000 XG
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.25/210
Conclusion
Both Daiwa Tanacom 750 and Shimano Twin Power XD A C 3000 XGX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Daiwa Tanacom 750 offers a ball bearings of 4, while Shimano Twin Power XD A C 3000 XGX stands out for a line retrieve per crank of 94 centimeter / 37.01 inch. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Daiwa Tanacom 750 and Shimano Twin Power XD A?
Daiwa Tanacom 750
- With premium bearings scoring 5 out of 10 (4), this reel delivers buttery smooth operation even with load
Shimano Twin Power XD A C 3000 XGX
- With a score like 8.67 out of 10 (200g / 7,05oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- 8.9 out of 10 (94 centimeter / 37.01 inch) in line retrieve, means it picks up line fast, very handy when chasing quick fish
Similar comparisons

Penn FIERCE IV 2500X vs Delphin BRONZ 2000X


Shimano 20 Stella 18000 HGX vs Shimano Tiagra 80WAX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 12IIX vs Shimano Sahara 3000 SS DH HG R


Shimano Catana FE 2500X vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 16IIX


Shimano Catana FE 2500X vs Shimano 20 Stella 18000 HGX


Daiwa 19 Certate 4000D-CX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 12IIX


Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LH-Left handX


Shimano 20 Stella 5000 HGX vs Delphin YUPIE


Delphin YUPIE vs Shimano Sahara 3000 SS DH HG R


Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX vs Shimano Catana FE 2500X


Shimano 20 Stella 18000 HGX vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LH-Left handX


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LH-Left handX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 16IIX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 8IIX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 16IIX


Shimano Sahara 3000 SS DH HG R vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 1500C - Spinning reel with front drag


Shimano Torium 16PGAX vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LH-Left handX


Daiwa Sweepfire E 1500C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Delphin YUPIE


Delphin BRONZ 2000X vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LH-Left handX


Daiwa Sweepfire E 1500C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Shimano Catana FE 2500X


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 6000X vs Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000


Delphin YUPIE vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LH-Left handX
