Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 1000X vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500-XHX

Delphin ANTIGRAVITY

Spinning

47.80 out of 100

Value for money3.5 out of 5

Quality classMedium

Durability3.68 out of 10

Ergonomics6.47 out of 10

Gear ratio5.2:1

Maximum drag0lbs

Weight159g / 5.61oz

Line retireve per crank0 inch

Ball bearings10+1

Technical Specifications

BrandDELPHIN
The main category of the reelSpinning
Price range~ €85.95
Is saltwater resistantNo
Spare spoolNo
Reel size1000
Handle typeSingle handle
Drag typeFront drag
Handle orientationLeft, Right
Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.1/270

Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT

Spinning

89.40 out of 100

Value for money4.5 out of 5

Quality classGood

Durability4.6 out of 10

Ergonomics6.35 out of 10

Gear ratio6.2:1

Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs

Weight195g / 6.88oz

Line retireve per crank87 centimeter / 34.25 inch

Ball bearings6

Technical Specifications

BrandDAIWA
The main category of the reelSpinning
Price range~ €179.33
Is saltwater resistantNo
Spare spoolNo
Reel size2500-XH
Handle typeSingle handle
Drag typeFront drag
Handle orientationLeft, Right
Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.2/150

Conclusion

Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500-XHX clearly outshines Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 1000X, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (10kg / 22,05lbs) and line retrieve per crank (87 centimeter / 34.25 inch). While Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 1000X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500-XHX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.

What's the difference between Delphin ANTIGRAVITY and Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT?

Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500-XHX

With a great drag score 9.6 out of 10 (10kg / 22,05lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
8.2 out of 10 (87 centimeter / 34.25 inch) in line retrieve, means it picks up line fast, very handy when chasing quick fish
Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency