Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 1000X vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000-CXHX

Delphin ANTIGRAVITY
Spinning
47.80 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classMedium
Durability3.68 out of 10
Ergonomics6.47 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag0lbs
Weight159g / 5.61oz
Line retireve per crank0 inch
Ball bearings10+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDELPHIN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €85.95
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size1000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.1/270

Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT
Spinning
90.10 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.62 out of 10
Ergonomics6.32 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight205g / 7.23oz
Line retireve per crank93 centimeter / 36.61 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €185.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3000-CXH
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.23/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000-CXHX clearly outshines Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 1000X, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (10kg / 22,05lbs) and line retrieve per crank (93 centimeter / 36.61 inch). While Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 1000X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000-CXHX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Delphin ANTIGRAVITY and Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT?
Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000-CXHX
- With a great drag score 9.6 out of 10 (10kg / 22,05lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- 8.8 out of 10 (93 centimeter / 36.61 inch) in line retrieve, means it picks up line fast, very handy when chasing quick fish
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa RX LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 4000-CX vs Shimano 21 Sustain 2500 HGFJX


Shimano 21 Sustain 2500 HGFJX vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2000-XHX


Shimano Catana FE 4000X vs Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 2000X


Shimano Catana 4000 RC vs Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 2000X


Shimano Catana 4000 RC vs Shimano Vanford FA 2500SHGAX


Shimano 21 Sustain 2500 HGFJX vs Abu GARCIA Zenon 1000 SX


Shimano Vanford FA 2500AX vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2000-XHX


Shimano Sahara 500 FI vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2500X


Shimano Twin Power FE 3000XGFEX vs Shimano 21 Sustain 2500 HGFJX


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2000-XHX vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 2500C - Spinning reel with front drag


Shimano Vanquish FC C2500SCX vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 2500C - Spinning reel with front drag


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2500X vs Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 2000X vs Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 2000X


Shimano Catana FE 4000X vs Shimano Sahara 500 FI


Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 4000-CX vs Shimano Vanford FA 2500SHGAX


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2000-XHX vs Shimano Catana 4000 RC


Shimano Vanford FA 2500AX vs Shimano 21 Sustain 2500 HGFJX


Abu GARCIA Zenon 1000 SX vs Shimano Catana 4000 RC


Shimano Sedona FJ C2000SHGFJX vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 2000X
