Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 1000X vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CX

Delphin ANTIGRAVITY
Spinning
47.80 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classMedium
Durability3.68 out of 10
Ergonomics6.47 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag0lbs
Weight159g / 5.61oz
Line retireve per crank0 inch
Ball bearings10+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDELPHIN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €85.95
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size1000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.1/270

Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ)
Spinning
89.70 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.58 out of 10
Ergonomics6.23 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight230g / 8.11oz
Line retireve per crank82 centimeter / 32.28 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €175.50
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000D-C
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.37/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CX clearly outshines Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 1000X, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (12kg / 26,46lbs) and ball bearings (6). While Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 1000X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Delphin ANTIGRAVITY and Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ)?
Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CX
- With a great drag score 10 out of 10 (12kg / 26,46lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- 6.71 out of 10 (82 centimeter / 32.28 inch) in line retrieve, means the reel delivers a steady and reliable retrieve which is ideal for most everyday techniques
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 3000D-CXHX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT2500X


Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 1000X vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 3000-C / JB4 0.19MM YELLOW 3000-CX


Shimano Catana 4000 RC vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 2500-XHX


Shimano Catana 4000 RC vs Daiwa Ninja LT 3000D-CX


Penn 2020 Clash II 2000X vs Shimano Stradic GTM 4000S RC Spinning reel with fighting drag


Penn 2020 Clash II 2000X vs Shimano Sahara FJ 4000X


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 6000X vs Shimano Stella FK 4000 MX


Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF vs Shimano Catana 4000 RC


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT2500X vs Shimano Stradic GTM 4000S RC Spinning reel with fighting drag


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT2500X vs Shimano Twinpower FD 4000M HG 4000MHGX


Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 2500-XHX


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 2500-XHX vs Delphin INKS 3000X


Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 3000D-CXHX vs Delphin INKS 3000X


Shimano Stradic GTM 4000S RC Spinning reel with fighting drag vs Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 1000X


Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF vs Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 4000-CX


Shimano Catana 4000 RC vs Shimano Stella FK 4000 MX


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 2500-XHX vs Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 3000D-CXHX


Delphin INKS 3000X vs Penn 2020 Clash II 2000X


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 2500-XHX vs Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 1000X


Shimano Catana 4000 RC vs Shimano Stradic GTM 4000S RC Spinning reel with fighting drag
