Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 1000X vs Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Delphin ANTIGRAVITY
Spinning
47.80 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classMedium
Durability3.68 out of 10
Ergonomics6.47 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag0lbs
Weight159g / 5.61oz
Line retireve per crank0 inch
Ball bearings10+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDELPHIN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €85.95
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size1000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.1/270

Penn Squall II Conventional
Multireels
55.50 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.54 out of 10
Ergonomics5.91 out of 10
Gear ratio6:1:1
Maximum drag11.3kg / 24,91lbs
Weight535g / 18.87oz
Line retireve per crank102 centimeter / 40.16 inch
Ball bearings7
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €161.90
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size30
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 400/0.4
Conclusion
Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX clearly outshines Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 1000X, offering significantly better performance in line retrieve per crank (102 centimeter / 40.16 inch) and ball bearings (7). While Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 1000X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Delphin ANTIGRAVITY and Penn Squall II Conventional?
Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 1000X
- The reel brings in line quickly with its 8 out of 10 (5.2:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX
- With a high retrieve rate of 9.47 out of 10 (102 centimeter / 40.16 inch), this reel is built for quick line recovery
- Scoring 8.5 out of 10 (7), this reel feels solid and smooth at the same time
Similar comparisons

Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LC-Right handX vs Daiwa 23 LEOBRITZ 300 JL


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LC-Right handX vs Shimano Tiagra 50WLRSAX


Shimano Twin Power FD 4000X vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 16IIX


Shimano Tiagra 50WAX vs Daiwa 23 LEOBRITZ 300 JL


Shimano Twin Power FD 4000X vs Shimano Torium 16HGA / Right handX


Shimano Twin Power FD 4000X vs Shimano Talica II 16IIAX


Shimano Tiagra 50WAX vs Delphin SHARX 4000X


Shimano Talica II 12IIAX vs Shimano Catana 2500 RC


Shimano Torium 16HGA / Right handX vs Shimano TLD II A 50 IIX


Shimano Sahara FJ 1000X vs Daiwa 23 LEOBRITZ 300 JL


Shimano Sahara FJ 1000X vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 2500-DX


Daiwa 20 Airity LT 2500-DX vs Shimano Tiagra 50WLRSAX


Daiwa Sweepfire E 1500C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 16IIX


Shimano Twin Power FD 4000X vs Shimano TLD II A 50 IIX


Shimano TLD II A 50 IIX vs Daiwa 23 LEOBRITZ 300 JL


Shimano Tiagra 50WAX vs Shimano TLD II A 50 IIX


Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 2500DX vs Shimano Twin Power FD 4000X


Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 2500-DX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 16IIX vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT PC 2500X


Shimano Tiagra 50WAX vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 1500C - Spinning reel with front drag
