Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 1000X vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Delphin ANTIGRAVITY
Spinning
47.80 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classMedium
Durability3.68 out of 10
Ergonomics6.47 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag0lbs
Weight159g / 5.61oz
Line retireve per crank0 inch
Ball bearings10+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDELPHIN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €85.95
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size1000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.1/270

Penn Squall II Conventional
Multireels
55.50 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.56 out of 10
Ergonomics5.89 out of 10
Gear ratio6:1:1
Maximum drag11.3kg / 24,91lbs
Weight545g / 19.22oz
Line retireve per crank102 centimeter / 40.16 inch
Ball bearings7
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €169.70
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size40 LH
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationLeft
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 385/0.39
Conclusion
Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX clearly outshines Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 1000X, offering significantly better performance in line retrieve per crank (102 centimeter / 40.16 inch) and ball bearings (7). While Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 1000X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Delphin ANTIGRAVITY and Penn Squall II Conventional?
Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 1000X
- The reel brings in line quickly with its 8 out of 10 (5.2:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX
- With a high retrieve rate of 9.47 out of 10 (102 centimeter / 40.16 inch), this reel is built for quick line recovery
- Scoring 8.5 out of 10 (7), this reel feels solid and smooth at the same time
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 2000X vs Delphin INKS 3000X


Daiwa 20 Airity LT 3000D-CX vs Shimano Talica 25II CAM 25II CAMX


Shimano 19 Stella 20000 PGX vs Shimano Cardiff 401A


Shimano 19 Stella 20000 PGX vs Delphin BRONZ 3000X


Daiwa Sweepfire E 2500C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Shimano 21 Sahara FJ 2500SHGFJX


Delphin BRONZ 3000X vs Shimano Talica 25II CAM 25II CAMX


Shimano Torium 16HGA / Right handX vs Shimano Cardiff 401A


Shimano 21 Sahara FJ 2500SHGFJX vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 2500C - Spinning reel with front drag


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 10IIX vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 3000D-CXHX


Delphin IXTREK 2000X vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 2000X


Delphin INKS 3000X vs Daiwa TANASENSOR


Shimano Torium 16HGA / Right handX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 2000X


Daiwa 19 Certate 3000-CXHX vs Shimano 21 Sahara FJ 2500SHGFJX


Shimano Tiagra 16X vs Shimano Torium 14HGA / Right handX


Daiwa Sweepfire E 2500C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 3000D-CXHX vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 2500C - Spinning reel with front drag


Shimano Cardiff 401A vs Shimano Tiagra 16X


Delphin IXTREK 2000X vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 10IIX vs Daiwa 19 Certate 3000-CXHX


Shimano Torium 30HGAL / Left-handedX vs Delphin IXTREK 2000X
