Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 1000X vs Shimano Sahara FJ 4000X

Delphin ANTIGRAVITY
Spinning
47.80 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classMedium
Durability3.68 out of 10
Ergonomics6.47 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag0lbs
Weight159g / 5.61oz
Line retireve per crank0 inch
Ball bearings10+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDELPHIN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €85.95
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size1000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.1/270

Shimano Sahara FJ
Spinning
47.70 out of 100
Value for money2 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability7 out of 10
Ergonomics6.07 out of 10
Gear ratio4.7:1
Maximum drag11kg / 24.25lbs
Weight280g / 9.88oz
Line retireve per crank75 centimeter / 29.53 inch
Ball bearings4+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €71.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.3/180
Conclusion
Both Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 1000X and Shimano Sahara FJ 4000X score below average overall, indicating some compromises in total score. If you must choose between them, Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 1000X offers a slight edge in gear ratio, while Shimano Sahara FJ 4000X may still be worth considering depending on specific preferences.
What's the difference between Delphin ANTIGRAVITY and Shimano Sahara FJ?
Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 1000X
- The reel brings in line quickly with its 8 out of 10 (5.2:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
- Solid value at €85.95, reliable and great performance, it’s a smart choice for a variety of spinning fishing needs
Shimano Sahara FJ 4000X
- With a great drag score 10 out of 10 (11kg / 24,25lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- When it comes to retrieve speed, a score of 5.71 out of 10 (75 centimeter / 29.53 inch) means slower line pickup, great when you need more control for slower fishing styles
- Landing a score of 8 out of 10 (4+1) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Shimano Catana 1000 RC vs Delphin BRONZ 2000X


Shimano 19 Stella 8000 PGX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 2000X


Shimano Catana 1000 RC vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 2000S-PX


Shimano 20 Stella 18000 HGX vs Shimano 19 Stella 8000 PGX


Shimano Sedona C3000 HG FI vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2000S-XH(U)X


Shimano 20 Stella 18000 HGX vs Delphin INKS 2000X


Shimano Sahara FJ 500X vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 3000C - Spinning reel with front drag


Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT PC 3000X vs Daiwa Lexa E LT 19 3000X


Daiwa Ninja LT 2500-XHX vs Daiwa BG 1500X


Shimano Twin Power FD C3000X vs Shimano 20 Stella 18000 HGX


Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT PC 3000X vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 2000S-PX


Shimano Sedona C3000 HG FI vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 2000S-PX


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2000S-XH(U)X vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 3000C - Spinning reel with front drag


Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT PC 3000X vs Shimano Twin Power FD C3000X


Shimano Twin Power FE 2000SFEX vs Delphin INKS 2000X


Shimano 19 Stella 8000 PGX vs Shimano 20 Stella 18000 HGX


Shimano Sedona C3000 HG FI vs Delphin INKS 2000X


Shimano Stella FK 2500X vs Shimano Twin Power FD C3000X


Daiwa BG 1500X vs Shimano Twin Power FE 2000SFEX


Delphin INKS 2000X vs Shimano 19 Stella 8000 PGX
