Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 2000X vs Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Delphin ANTIGRAVITY
Spinning
47.60 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classMedium
Durability3.7 out of 10
Ergonomics6.41 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag0lbs
Weight176g / 6.21oz
Line retireve per crank0 inch
Ball bearings10+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDELPHIN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €89.95
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.12/290

Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD
Feeder And Match
87.30 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.5 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio4.7:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight430g / 15.17oz
Line retireve per crank96 centimeter / 37.8 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelFeeder and match
- Price range~ €209.80
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size-
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD clearly outshines Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 2000X, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (12kg / 26,46lbs) and line retrieve per crank (96 centimeter / 37.8 inch). While Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 2000X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Delphin ANTIGRAVITY and Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD?
Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD
- With a maximum drag of 10 out of 10 (12kg / 26,46lbs), this reel offers excellent stopping power, giving fishermen the confidence to handle pressure situations with ease
- With 9.1 out of 10 score (96 centimeter / 37.8 inch) (line retrieve), this reel excels in speed which makes it perfect for rapid match fishing where every second counts
- A ball bearing score of 7 out of 10 (4), makes this reel runs fairly smooth, offering reliable fishing for general feeder and match cases
Similar comparisons

Daiwa Regal LT 1000 DX vs Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 SX


Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 4010 / Single crankX vs Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 SX


Daiwa 21 TOURNAMENT FEEDER 25QD vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT6000X


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 5000-CX vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 4010 / Single crankX


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 4000D-CX vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 4012X


Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 4012X vs Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QD-DHX


Daiwa Regal LT 1000 DX vs Daiwa 24 TDR QD 2508QDX


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT6000X


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 1000DX vs Shimano AERO XR 4000X


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT3000-CX vs Shimano Catana FE 4000 HGX


Daiwa 24 TDR QD 2508QDX vs Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QD-DHX


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 3000 HGX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 6000SSX vs Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 3000 HGX vs Shimano AERO XR 4000X


Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 4010 / Single crankX vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 3000 HGX


Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 6000SS-CPX vs Shimano AERO XR 4000X


Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 SX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT6000X


Daiwa 24 TDR QD 2508QDX vs Shimano AERO XR 4000X


Shimano Catana FE 4000 HGX vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 3000 HGX


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 6000SS-CPX
