Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 2000X vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2500D(U)X

Delphin ANTIGRAVITY

Spinning

47.60 out of 100

Value for money3.5 out of 5

Quality classMedium

Durability3.7 out of 10

Ergonomics6.41 out of 10

Gear ratio5.2:1

Maximum drag0lbs

Weight176g / 6.21oz

Line retireve per crank0 inch

Ball bearings10+1

Technical Specifications

BrandDELPHIN
The main category of the reelSpinning
Price range~ €89.95
Is saltwater resistantNo
Spare spoolNo
Reel size2000
Handle typeSingle handle
Drag typeFront drag
Handle orientationLeft, Right
Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.12/290

Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT

Spinning

64.40 out of 100

Value for money2.5 out of 5

Quality classLow

Durability3 out of 10

Ergonomics6.33 out of 10

Gear ratio5.3:1

Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs

Weight200g / 7.05oz

Line retireve per crank75 centimeter / 29.53 inch

Ball bearings5

Technical Specifications

BrandDAIWA
The main category of the reelSpinning
Price range~ €70.33
Is saltwater resistantNo
Spare spoolNo
Reel size2500D(U)
Handle typeSingle handle
Drag typeFront drag
Handle orientationLeft, Right
Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150

Conclusion

Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2500D(U)X clearly outshines Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 2000X, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (10kg / 22,05lbs) and ball bearings (5). While Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 2000X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2500D(U)X is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.

What's the difference between Delphin ANTIGRAVITY and Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT?

Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2500D(U)X

With a great drag score 9.6 out of 10 (10kg / 22,05lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
When it comes to retrieve speed, a score of 5.71 out of 10 (75 centimeter / 29.53 inch) means slower line pickup, great when you need more control for slower fishing styles
Landing a score of 8 out of 10 (5) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency