Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 2000X vs Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Delphin ANTIGRAVITY
Spinning
47.60 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classMedium
Durability3.7 out of 10
Ergonomics6.41 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag0lbs
Weight176g / 6.21oz
Line retireve per crank0 inch
Ball bearings10+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDELPHIN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €89.95
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.12/290

Penn Squall II Conventional
Multireels
55.60 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.51 out of 10
Ergonomics5.93 out of 10
Gear ratio6:1:1
Maximum drag11.3kg / 24,91lbs
Weight520g / 18.34oz
Line retireve per crank102 centimeter / 40.16 inch
Ball bearings7
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €154.10
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size25N
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 315/0.32
Conclusion
Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX clearly outshines Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 2000X, offering significantly better performance in line retrieve per crank (102 centimeter / 40.16 inch) and ball bearings (7). While Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 2000X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Delphin ANTIGRAVITY and Penn Squall II Conventional?
Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 2000X
- The reel brings in line quickly with its 8 out of 10 (5.2:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX
- With a high retrieve rate of 9.47 out of 10 (102 centimeter / 40.16 inch), this reel is built for quick line recovery
- Scoring 8.5 out of 10 (7), this reel feels solid and smooth at the same time
Similar comparisons

Shimano TLD II A 30 IIX vs Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 1000X


Shimano Torium 20PGAX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 12IIX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 12IIX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX


Penn Battle III 2000X vs Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 1000X


Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 1000X vs Shimano Tiagra 50WLRSAX


Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 3000DX vs Shimano Twin Power FD C3000X


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 6000X vs Daiwa Tanacom 750


Shimano Twin Power FD C3000X vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 6000X


Shimano Talica 20II CAM 20II CAMX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 6000X


Shimano Ultegra C3000HGDX vs Shimano Torium 20PGAX


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 6000X vs Shimano Tiagra 50WLRSAX


Shimano Tiagra 30WLRSAX vs Shimano Sedona FJ 2500SFJX


Penn Battle III 2000X vs Shimano TLD II A 30 IIX


Daiwa Tanacom 750 vs Daiwa TANACOM 800X


Daiwa BG 8000X vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 12IIX


Shimano Ultegra C3000HGDX vs Daiwa BG 8000X


Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 vs Shimano Torium 20PGAX


Shimano Tiagra 30WLRSAX vs Shimano Ultegra C3000HGDX


Penn Battle III 2000X vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 3000DX


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 5000-CX vs Daiwa TANACOM 800X
