Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 2000X vs Shimano Sahara FJ 4000X

Delphin ANTIGRAVITY
Spinning
47.60 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classMedium
Durability3.7 out of 10
Ergonomics6.41 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag0lbs
Weight176g / 6.21oz
Line retireve per crank0 inch
Ball bearings10+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDELPHIN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €89.95
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.12/290

Shimano Sahara FJ
Spinning
47.70 out of 100
Value for money2 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability7 out of 10
Ergonomics6.07 out of 10
Gear ratio4.7:1
Maximum drag11kg / 24.25lbs
Weight280g / 9.88oz
Line retireve per crank75 centimeter / 29.53 inch
Ball bearings4+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €71.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.3/180
Conclusion
Both Shimano Sahara FJ 4000X and Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 2000X score below average overall, indicating some compromises in total score. If you must choose between them, Shimano Sahara FJ 4000X offers a slight edge in maximum drag, while Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 2000X may still be worth considering depending on specific preferences.
What's the difference between Delphin ANTIGRAVITY and Shimano Sahara FJ?
Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 2000X
- The reel brings in line quickly with its 8 out of 10 (5.2:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
- Solid value at €89.95, reliable and great performance, it’s a smart choice for a variety of spinning fishing needs
Shimano Sahara FJ 4000X
- With a great drag score 10 out of 10 (11kg / 24,25lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- When it comes to retrieve speed, a score of 5.71 out of 10 (75 centimeter / 29.53 inch) means slower line pickup, great when you need more control for slower fishing styles
- Landing a score of 8 out of 10 (4+1) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 2500X vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CXHX


Shimano Sahara 2500 R vs Shimano Twin Power FE 3000FEX


Shimano Twin Power FE 3000FEX vs Shimano Stella FK 1000X


Shimano 21 Sustain 4000 FJX vs Shimano Stella FK 1000X


Shimano Vanquish FC 4000XGCX vs Shimano Vanquish FC C3000MHGCX


Penn Battle III 8000 HSX vs Shimano Vanquish FC C3000MHGCX


Shimano 21 Sustain 4000 FJX vs Shimano Vanford FA C2500SAX


Daiwa RX LT 2000X vs Shimano 21 Sustain 4000 FJX


Daiwa Ninja LT 3000-CX vs Shimano Sahara 2500 DH R


Penn Battle III 8000 HSX vs Shimano 21 Sustain 4000 FJX


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CXHX vs Shimano Sahara 2500 R


Shimano Vanquish FC C3000MHGCX vs Daiwa 19 Certate 3000-CXHX


Daiwa RX LT 2000X vs Shimano Vanford FA C2500SAX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT4000-CX vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 5000C - Spinning reel with front drag


Shimano Twin Power FE 3000FEX vs Shimano Stradic GTM 3000S RC Spinning reel with fighting drag


Shimano Vanquish FC C3000MHGCX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT4000-CX


Shimano Sahara 2500 R vs Shimano Sedona 8000 FI


Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 2500X vs Shimano Vanford FA C2500SAX


Shimano Vanquish FC C3000MHGCX vs Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 2500X


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT4000-CX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CXHX
