Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 3000X vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000D-CX

Delphin ANTIGRAVITY
Spinning
46.90 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classMedium
Durability3.72 out of 10
Ergonomics6.27 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag0lbs
Weight219g / 7.73oz
Line retireve per crank0 inch
Ball bearings10+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDELPHIN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €94.95
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.14/290

Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT
Spinning
82.70 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.62 out of 10
Ergonomics6.32 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight205g / 7.23oz
Line retireve per crank77 centimeter / 30.31 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €185.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3000D-C
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.33/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000D-CX clearly outshines Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 3000X, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (10kg / 22,05lbs) and ball bearings (6). While Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 3000X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000D-CX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Delphin ANTIGRAVITY and Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT?
Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000D-CX
- With a great drag score 9.6 out of 10 (10kg / 22,05lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- 6 out of 10 (77 centimeter / 30.31 inch) in line retrieve, means the reel delivers a steady and reliable retrieve which is ideal for most everyday techniques
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Similar comparisons

Shimano Sahara 4000 R vs Shimano 21 Sustain 2500 FJX


Shimano Twin Power FD C3000XGX vs Shimano Sedona FJ 2500SFJX


Shimano Catana FE 2500 HGX vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 2000C - Spinning reel with front drag


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000DX vs Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 SX


Shimano Sedona FJ 2500SFJX vs Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 3000D-CXHX


Daiwa Freams LT 3000D-CX vs Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 SX


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000D-CXHX vs Shimano Sedona FJ 2500SFJX


Shimano Sedona FJ 2500SFJX vs Shimano Stella FK 2500 HGX


Shimano Catana FE 2500 HGX vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000D-CXHX


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 2000X vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000X


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000D-CXHX vs Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 SX


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 2000X vs Shimano Stella FK 2500 HGX


Shimano Catana FE 2500 HGX vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 2500X


Shimano Twin Power FD C3000XGX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CX


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 2000X vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 2000C - Spinning reel with front drag


Shimano Sahara 4000 R vs Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 3000D-CXHX


Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 3000D-CXHX vs Shimano 21 Sustain 2500 FJX


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000D-CXHX vs Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 3000D-CXHX


Daiwa Sweepfire E 2000C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 2000X


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CX vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000D-CXHX
