Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 3000X vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 4000D-CX

Delphin ANTIGRAVITY
Spinning
46.90 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classMedium
Durability3.72 out of 10
Ergonomics6.27 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag0lbs
Weight219g / 7.73oz
Line retireve per crank0 inch
Ball bearings10+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDELPHIN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €94.95
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.14/290

Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT
Spinning
84.00 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.65 out of 10
Ergonomics6.23 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight230g / 8.11oz
Line retireve per crank82 centimeter / 32.28 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €195.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000D-C
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.37/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 4000D-CX clearly outshines Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 3000X, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (12kg / 26,46lbs) and ball bearings (6). While Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 3000X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 4000D-CX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Delphin ANTIGRAVITY and Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT?
Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 4000D-CX
- With a great drag score 10 out of 10 (12kg / 26,46lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- 6.71 out of 10 (82 centimeter / 32.28 inch) in line retrieve, means the reel delivers a steady and reliable retrieve which is ideal for most everyday techniques
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Similar comparisons

Shimano 21 Nexave FI 3000 HGX vs Shimano 21 Sustain 4000 FJX


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2500D(U)X vs Shimano 21 Sahara FJ C3000HGFJX


Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QC 750X vs Shimano 21 Sustain 4000 FJX


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 5000-CX vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 2500-DX


Abu GARCIA Zenon 1000 SX vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 1000DX


Shimano 21 Sustain 4000 FJX vs Delphin INKS 6000X


Delphin INKS 3000X vs Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QC 750X


Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 4000X vs Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QC 750X


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 1000DX vs Delphin INKS 3000X


Shimano Twin Power FD C3000X vs Abu GARCIA Zenon 1000 SX


Delphin INKS 6000X vs Penn FIERCE IV 2500X


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2500-XHX


Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT PC 3000X vs Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 4000X


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 1000DX vs Shimano Twin Power FD C3000X


Shimano Sedona FJ C5000XGFJX vs Shimano Twin Power FD C3000X


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 1000DX vs Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QC 750X


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2500-XHX vs Shimano Twin Power FD C3000X


Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 4000X vs Shimano Sedona FJ C5000XGFJX


Shimano Vanquish FC C2000SCX vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 1000DX


Shimano Twin Power FD C3000X vs Penn FIERCE IV 2500X
