Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 3000X vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000D-CX

Delphin ANTIGRAVITY
Spinning
46.90 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classMedium
Durability3.72 out of 10
Ergonomics6.27 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag0lbs
Weight219g / 7.73oz
Line retireve per crank0 inch
Ball bearings10+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDELPHIN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €94.95
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.14/290

Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT
Spinning
78.10 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classMedium
Durability7.69 out of 10
Ergonomics6.32 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight205g / 7.23oz
Line retireve per crank80 centimeter / 31.5 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €89.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3000D-C
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.33/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000D-CX clearly outshines Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 3000X, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (10kg / 22,05lbs) and ball bearings (6). While Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 3000X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000D-CX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Delphin ANTIGRAVITY and Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT?
Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000D-CX
- With a great drag score 9.6 out of 10 (10kg / 22,05lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- 6.43 out of 10 (80 centimeter / 31.5 inch) in line retrieve, means the reel delivers a steady and reliable retrieve which is ideal for most everyday techniques
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 2000DX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2000D-PX


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 2000DX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT1000X


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 5000-CX vs Shimano Sahara 1000 R


Shimano Stradic FM vs Shimano Stella FK C 3000 XGX


Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 SX vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 2000S-HX


Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 2000X vs Shimano Sahara 1000 R


Shimano Sedona FJ 2500SFJX vs Shimano Ultegra C2000SDX


Shimano Stradic FM vs Shimano Sedona FJ 2500SFJX


Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 2000X vs Shimano Sedona FJ C5000XGFJX


Shimano Ultegra C2000SDX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 5000-CX


Daiwa Certate LT 19 5000D-XHX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2000D-PX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT1000X vs Shimano Sedona FJ 2500SFJX


Shimano Sedona FJ 2500SFJX vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 2000X


Shimano Stradic FM vs Shimano Sedona FJ C5000XGFJX


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 5000-CX vs Shimano Twin Power FD C3000X


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT1000X vs Shimano Sedona FJ C5000XGFJX


Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 1000X vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2000D-PX


Shimano Sahara 1000 R vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT1000X


Shimano Twin Power FD C3000X vs Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 2500X


Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 2500X vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 5000-CX
