Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 3000X vs Daiwa TD FEEDER QD
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Delphin ANTIGRAVITY
Spinning
46.90 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classMedium
Durability3.72 out of 10
Ergonomics6.27 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag0lbs
Weight219g / 7.73oz
Line retireve per crank0 inch
Ball bearings10+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDELPHIN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €94.95
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.14/290

Daiwa TD FEEDER QD
Feeder And Match
61.30 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classMedium
Durability3.72 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio4.9:1
Maximum drag8kg
Weight440g / 15.52oz
Line retireve per crank87 centimeter
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelFeeder and match
- Price range~ €95.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4012
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.29/150
Conclusion
Daiwa TD FEEDER QD clearly outshines Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 3000X, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (8kg) and line retrieve per crank (87 centimeter). While Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 3000X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa TD FEEDER QD is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Delphin ANTIGRAVITY and Daiwa TD FEEDER QD?
Daiwa TD FEEDER QD
- With a maximum drag of 9.6 out of 10 (8kg), this reel offers excellent stopping power, giving fishermen the confidence to handle pressure situations with ease
- A line retrieve score of 8.2 out of 10 87 centimeter), this reel offers quick and smooth line pickup, ideal for keeping up during active feeder sessions
- Rated at 8.67 out of 10 (6) for ball bearings, this reel provides smooth and consistent performance.. great for active match anglers
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QDX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500-XHX


Daiwa TD Match 3012X vs Shimano AERO XR C3000X


Penn Battle III 2000X vs Daiwa TD FEEDER QD


Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QR 750X vs Delphin RAYA body


Daiwa Crossfire LT 3000-CX vs Shimano AERO XR C5000X


Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 2500DX vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX


Daiwa TD FEEDER QD vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX


Shimano AERO XR C3000X vs Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QDX


Daiwa 20 Airity LT 1000DX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500-XHX


Daiwa 18 Ninja Match and Feeder LT 4000-C (Match and Feeder)X vs Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QDX


Daiwa 21 TOURNAMENT FEEDER 25QD vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 3000DX


Daiwa TD FEEDER QD vs Cormoran Veycor Feeder 5PiF


Penn Battle III 2000X vs Shimano Twin Power FD C3000X


Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 2500X vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 3000DX


Daiwa 20 Airity LT 1000DX vs Daiwa TD FEEDER QD


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500-XHX vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 2500DX


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500-XHX vs Daiwa TD FEEDER QD


Shimano AERO XR C3000X vs Shimano Twin Power FD C3000X


Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 1000DX


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500-XHX vs Daiwa TD Match 3012X
