Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 3000X vs Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Delphin ANTIGRAVITY
Spinning
46.90 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classMedium
Durability3.72 out of 10
Ergonomics6.27 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag0lbs
Weight219g / 7.73oz
Line retireve per crank0 inch
Ball bearings10+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDELPHIN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €94.95
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.14/290

Penn Squall II Conventional
Multireels
55.60 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.51 out of 10
Ergonomics5.93 out of 10
Gear ratio6:1:1
Maximum drag11.3kg / 24,91lbs
Weight520g / 18.34oz
Line retireve per crank102 centimeter / 40.16 inch
Ball bearings7
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €154.10
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size25N
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 315/0.32
Conclusion
Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX clearly outshines Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 3000X, offering significantly better performance in line retrieve per crank (102 centimeter / 40.16 inch) and ball bearings (7). While Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 3000X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Delphin ANTIGRAVITY and Penn Squall II Conventional?
Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 3000X
- The reel brings in line quickly with its 8 out of 10 (5.2:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX
- With a high retrieve rate of 9.47 out of 10 (102 centimeter / 40.16 inch), this reel is built for quick line recovery
- Scoring 8.5 out of 10 (7), this reel feels solid and smooth at the same time
Similar comparisons

Shimano Cardiff 301A vs Shimano TLD II A 20 IIX


Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX vs Shimano Aero C5000X


Shimano Ocea Jigger 4000 HGX vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) FC 2500X


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 6000DX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 5000D-CX


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT PC 2500X vs Shimano Torium 16HGA / Right handX


Shimano Cardiff 301A vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) FC 2500X


Shimano TLD II A 20 IIX vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT PC 2500X


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 5000D-CXHX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 8IIX


Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX vs Shimano Ocea Jigger 4000 HGX


Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 2500X vs Shimano Cardiff 301A


Shimano Cardiff 301A vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 5000D-CX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 8IIX vs Shimano TLD II A 20 IIX


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 5000D-CXHX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 5000D-CX vs Shimano Torium 16HGA / Right handX


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) FC 2500X vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LC-Right handX


Shimano Aero C5000X vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 3000-CXH(U)X


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 12IIX vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LC-Right handX


Shimano TLD II A 20 IIX vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) FC 2500X


Shimano Torium 20PGAX vs Shimano Stella FK C 3000 M HGX


Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX vs Shimano Stella FK C 3000 M HGX
