Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 3000X vs Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Delphin ANTIGRAVITY
Spinning
46.90 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classMedium
Durability3.72 out of 10
Ergonomics6.27 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag0lbs
Weight219g / 7.73oz
Line retireve per crank0 inch
Ball bearings10+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDELPHIN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €94.95
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.14/290

Penn Squall II Conventional
Multireels
55.50 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.54 out of 10
Ergonomics5.91 out of 10
Gear ratio6:1:1
Maximum drag11.3kg / 24,91lbs
Weight535g / 18.87oz
Line retireve per crank102 centimeter / 40.16 inch
Ball bearings7
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €161.90
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size30
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 400/0.4
Conclusion
Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX clearly outshines Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 3000X, offering significantly better performance in line retrieve per crank (102 centimeter / 40.16 inch) and ball bearings (7). While Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 3000X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Delphin ANTIGRAVITY and Penn Squall II Conventional?
Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 3000X
- The reel brings in line quickly with its 8 out of 10 (5.2:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX
- With a high retrieve rate of 9.47 out of 10 (102 centimeter / 40.16 inch), this reel is built for quick line recovery
- Scoring 8.5 out of 10 (7), this reel feels solid and smooth at the same time
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000-CX vs Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX


Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS vs Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX


Shimano Talica 25II CAM 25II CAMX vs Shimano TLD II A 50 IIX


Shimano Catana 3000 SRC vs Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS


Daiwa 20 Airity LT 3000D-CX vs Shimano Cardiff XR C2000SHGX


Shimano Talica II 12IIAX vs Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX


Shimano Twin Power XD A C 3000 XGX vs Shimano Sahara 3000S R


Shimano Tiagra 50AX vs Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX


Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS vs Shimano Tiagra 50AX


Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX vs Shimano Tekota 600 HGA / Right handX


Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX vs Mitchell MX2 Spinning 3000X


Shimano Torium 20HGA / Right handX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 25IIX


Shimano Sahara 3000S R vs Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX


Shimano Talica II 12IIAX vs Shimano Torium 20HGA / Right handX


Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS vs Shimano Talica II 12IIAX


Shimano Ocea Jigger 2000 NR PGX vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 3000D-CX


Shimano Talica 25II CAM 25II CAMX vs Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS


Shimano Sahara 3000S R vs Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX


Shimano Tiagra 50AX vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 3000D-CX


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 5000-CX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 25IIX
