Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 3000X vs Shimano AERO XR 4000X
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Delphin ANTIGRAVITY
Spinning
46.90 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classMedium
Durability3.72 out of 10
Ergonomics6.27 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag0lbs
Weight219g / 7.73oz
Line retireve per crank0 inch
Ball bearings10+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDELPHIN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €94.95
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.14/290

Shimano AERO XR
Feeder And Match
78.30 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.1 out of 10
Gear ratio4.7
Maximum drag11kg / 24.25lbs
Weight245g / 8.64oz
Line retireve per crank75 centimeter / 29.53 inch
Ball bearings5+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelFeeder and match
- Price range~ €121.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.35/130
Conclusion
Shimano AERO XR 4000X clearly outshines Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 3000X, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (11kg / 24,25lbs) and ball bearings (5+1). While Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 3000X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Shimano AERO XR 4000X is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Delphin ANTIGRAVITY and Shimano AERO XR?
Shimano AERO XR 4000X
- With a maximum drag of 10 out of 10 (11kg / 24,25lbs), this reel offers excellent stopping power, giving fishermen the confidence to handle pressure situations with ease
- With a line retrieve of 75 centimeter / 29.53 inch (5.71 out of 10), this reel retrieves slowly.. suitable for relaxed feeder fishing
- Rated at 8.67 out of 10 (5+1) for ball bearings, this reel provides smooth and consistent performance.. great for active match anglers
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 24 TDR QD 2508QDX


Penn 2020 Clash II 2000X vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) FC 2000-PX


Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 3012X vs Shimano Twin Power FD 1000X


Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD vs Daiwa 21 TOURNAMENT FEEDER 25QD


Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 4000-CX vs Shimano Complex XR 2500X


Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 3012X vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) FC 2000-PX


Penn 2020 Clash II 2000X vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 3000CXHX


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 3000DX vs Delphin INKS 5000X


Shimano Complex XR 2500X vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) FC 2000-PX


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2000X vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 3000DX


Delphin INKS 5000X vs Shimano Complex XR 2500X


Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 3012X vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 3000DX


Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX vs Shimano Complex XR 2500X


Shimano Catana 2500 RC vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 2500DX


Daiwa 24 TDR QD 2508QDX vs Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD


Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 4010 / Single crankX vs Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 5000S-CPX


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) FC 2000-PX vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 3000DX


Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 5000S-CPX vs Shimano Catana 2500 RC


Daiwa TD FEEDER QD vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 24 TDR QD 2508QDX vs Shimano Catana 2500 RC
