Delphin BRONZ 2000X vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CX

Delphin BRONZ
Spinning
49.50 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.28 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag0lbs
Weight215g / 7.58oz
Line retireve per crank-
Ball bearings2
Technical Specifications
- BrandDELPHIN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €13.95
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.18/245

Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ)
Spinning
89.70 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.58 out of 10
Ergonomics6.23 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight230g / 8.11oz
Line retireve per crank82 centimeter / 32.28 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €175.50
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000D-C
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.37/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CX clearly outshines Delphin BRONZ 2000X, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (12kg / 26,46lbs) and line retrieve per crank (82 centimeter / 32.28 inch). While Delphin BRONZ 2000X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Delphin BRONZ and Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ)?
Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CX
- With a great drag score 10 out of 10 (12kg / 26,46lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- 6.71 out of 10 (82 centimeter / 32.28 inch) in line retrieve, means the reel delivers a steady and reliable retrieve which is ideal for most everyday techniques
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Shimano Sahara FJ C 3000X vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) FC 2500X


Mitchell 308 2000X vs Shimano Twin Power FD 1000X


Shimano Twin Power FE 2000SFEX vs Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 2500X


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) FC 2500X vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2000D-PX


Shimano Sahara FJ C 5000 XGX vs Shimano Sienna 1000X


Shimano Sahara FJ C 5000 XGX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 2000SFEX


Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 3000-CXHX vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) FC 2500X


Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 3000-CXHX vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 5000D-CXHX


Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QR 750X vs Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 2500X


Shimano 21 Sustain 2500 HGFJX vs Mitchell 308 2000X


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 2500 HGX vs Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 3000-CXHX


Shimano 21 Sustain 2500 FJX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 2000SFEX


Shimano 20 Stella 6000 PGX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 2000SFEX


Mitchell 308 2000X vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2000D-PX


Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 5000D-CXHX vs Shimano Sahara FJ C 3000X


Shimano Sahara FJ C 5000 XGX vs Shimano 21 Sustain 3000 FJX


Shimano Sienna 1000X vs Delphin IXTREK 2000X


Shimano Twin Power FE 2000SFEX vs Shimano 21 Sustain 2500 HGFJX


Shimano 19 Stella 10000 PGX vs Shimano 21 Sustain 2500 FJX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2000D-PX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 2000SFEX
