Delphin BRONZ 2000X vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Delphin BRONZ
Spinning
49.50 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.28 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag0lbs
Weight215g / 7.58oz
Line retireve per crank-
Ball bearings2
Technical Specifications
- BrandDELPHIN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €13.95
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.18/245

Penn Squall II Conventional
Multireels
55.50 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.56 out of 10
Ergonomics5.89 out of 10
Gear ratio6:1:1
Maximum drag11.3kg / 24,91lbs
Weight545g / 19.22oz
Line retireve per crank102 centimeter / 40.16 inch
Ball bearings7
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €169.70
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size40
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 385/0.39
Conclusion
Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX clearly outshines Delphin BRONZ 2000X, offering significantly better performance in line retrieve per crank (102 centimeter / 40.16 inch) and ball bearings (7). While Delphin BRONZ 2000X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Delphin BRONZ and Penn Squall II Conventional?
Delphin BRONZ 2000X
- Thanks to its 7 out of 10 (5.1:1) gear ratio, the reel offers a strong balance between torque and quick retrieval
Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX
- With a high retrieve rate of 9.47 out of 10 (102 centimeter / 40.16 inch), this reel is built for quick line recovery
- Scoring 8.5 out of 10 (7), this reel feels solid and smooth at the same time
Similar comparisons

Shimano Sahara 3000S R vs Shimano TLD II A 50 IIX


Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 2000DX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 10IIX vs Daiwa Ninja LT 3000-CXHX


Shimano Tiagra 50AX vs Shimano TLD II A 50 IIX


Shimano Torium 40HGA / Right HandX vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 5000D-CXHX


Shimano Torium 20PGAX vs Shimano TLD II A 50 IIX


Shimano Sahara 3000S R vs Penn Sargus II Spinning 2500X


Shimano Sahara 3000S R vs Shimano Tiagra 30WLRSAX


Shimano Torium 40HGA / Right HandX vs Shimano Tekota 600 Line Counter A 600 HGA LC / Right handX


Shimano Tiagra 80WAX vs Daiwa TANACOM 800X


Daiwa TANACOM 800X vs Shimano Tekota 600 Line Counter A 600 HGA LC / Right handX


Daiwa TANACOM 800X vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 2000DX


Shimano TLD II A 50 IIX vs Shimano Torium 20PGAX


Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 5000D-CXHX


Daiwa Regal LT 2500 DX vs Shimano Tiagra 30WLRSAX


Shimano TLD II A 50 IIX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 10IIX


Penn Sargus II Spinning 2500X vs Daiwa Ninja LT 3000-CXHX


Shimano Stella FK C 5000 XGX vs Daiwa Regal LT 2500 DX


Shimano Tiagra 30WLRSAX vs Shimano Tekota 600 Line Counter A 600 HGA LC / Right handX


Shimano Tiagra 80WAX vs Shimano Tiagra 50AX
