Delphin BRONZ 3000X vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000S-HX

Delphin BRONZ
Spinning
49.40 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.27 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag0lbs
Weight220g / 7.76oz
Line retireve per crank-
Ball bearings2
Technical Specifications
- BrandDELPHIN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €14.95
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.2/270

Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ)
Spinning
85.50 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.53 out of 10
Ergonomics6.42 out of 10
Gear ratio5.8:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs
Weight175g / 6.17oz
Line retireve per crank76 centimeter / 29.92 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €159.80
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2000S-H
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.14/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000S-HX clearly outshines Delphin BRONZ 3000X, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (5kg / 11,02lbs) and durability (8.53 out of 10). While Delphin BRONZ 3000X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000S-HX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Delphin BRONZ and Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ)?
Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000S-HX
- A drag rating of 6.38 out of 10 (5kg / 11,02lbs) gives you steady control and it's perfect for most freshwater fish and light saltwater action
- When it comes to retrieve speed, a score of 5.86 out of 10 (76 centimeter / 29.92 inch) means slower line pickup, great when you need more control for slower fishing styles
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Shimano Sedona C2000 HG SFI vs Mitchell MX2 Spinning 3000X


Shimano 20 Stella 6000 PGX vs Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 3000D-CXHX


Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 2500DX


Shimano 19 Stella 30000X vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 2500DX


Delphin BRONZ 2000X vs Shimano Twin Power FD C3000XGX


Delphin INKS 3000X vs Delphin BRONZ 2000X


Shimano Twin Power FE 4000XGFEX vs Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 3000D-CXHX


Shimano 19 Stella 30000X vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 3000X


Shimano Twin Power FE 4000XGFEX vs Daiwa 19 Certate 4000D-CX


Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 2500X vs Shimano Sedona C2000 HG SFI


Shimano Sedona C2000 HG SFI vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 2500DX


Shimano Vanford FA C2000HGAX vs Shimano Sedona C2000 HG SFI


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 2500X vs Shimano Twin Power FE 4000MFEX


Shimano Twin Power FE 4000MFEX vs Delphin BRONZ 2000X


Delphin BRONZ 2000X vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 2500DX


Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 2500X vs Shimano 19 Stella 30000X


Shimano Sedona C2000 HG SFI vs Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 4000-CX


Shimano Vanford FA C2000HGAX vs Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 2500X


Shimano 20 Stella 6000 PGX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT2000X


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT2000X vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 3000X
