Delphin BRONZ 3000X vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CX

Delphin BRONZ
Spinning
49.40 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.27 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag0lbs
Weight220g / 7.76oz
Line retireve per crank-
Ball bearings2
Technical Specifications
- BrandDELPHIN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €14.95
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.2/270

Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ)
Spinning
89.70 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.58 out of 10
Ergonomics6.23 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight230g / 8.11oz
Line retireve per crank82 centimeter / 32.28 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €175.50
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000D-C
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.37/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CX clearly outshines Delphin BRONZ 3000X, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (12kg / 26,46lbs) and line retrieve per crank (82 centimeter / 32.28 inch). While Delphin BRONZ 3000X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Delphin BRONZ and Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ)?
Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CX
- With a great drag score 10 out of 10 (12kg / 26,46lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- 6.71 out of 10 (82 centimeter / 32.28 inch) in line retrieve, means the reel delivers a steady and reliable retrieve which is ideal for most everyday techniques
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 2500 / JB4 0.17MM YELLOW 2500X


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 2500 / JB4 0.17MM YELLOW 2500X vs Shimano Vanford FA 2500AX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 2500 / JB4 0.17MM YELLOW 2500X vs Shimano Sahara FJ C 5000 XGX


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 4000-CX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 4000XGFEX


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500DX vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 4000-CX


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 2500 HGX vs Daiwa 20 Luvias LT 3000D-CX


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 2500 HGX vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 3500C - Spinning reel with front drag


Delphin CarbonIX 1000X vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 3500C - Spinning reel with front drag


Delphin HORNET 60X vs Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 2500X


Shimano Sedona 2500 HG FI vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT4000-CX


Shimano Sedona 2500 HG FI vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 3500C - Spinning reel with front drag


Shimano Sedona 2500 HG FI vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 2500 HGX


Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 2500DX vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500DX


Shimano Twin Power FE 4000XGFEX vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 3500C - Spinning reel with front drag


Daiwa 20 Luvias LT 3000D-CX vs Shimano Sedona 2500 HG FI


Shimano Twin Power FE 4000XGFEX vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 2500 HGX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 2500 / JB4 0.17MM YELLOW 2500X vs Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 2500DX


Delphin HORNET 60X vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT4000-CX


Daiwa Freams LT 2500DX vs Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 2500X


Delphin CarbonIX 1000X vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 2500D-XHX
