Delphin BRONZ 3000X vs Penn Battle III 6000X

Delphin BRONZ
Spinning
49.40 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.27 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag0lbs
Weight220g / 7.76oz
Line retireve per crank-
Ball bearings2
Technical Specifications
- BrandDELPHIN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €14.95
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.2/270

Penn Battle III
Spinning
67.10 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classMedium
Durability7.81 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.6:1
Maximum drag11.3kg / 24,91lbs
Weight590g / 20.81oz
Line retireve per crank104 centimeter / 40.94 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €113.30
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size6000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.46/310
Conclusion
Penn Battle III 6000X clearly outshines Delphin BRONZ 3000X, offering significantly better performance in line retrieve per crank (104 centimeter / 40.94 inch) and durability (7.81 out of 10). While Delphin BRONZ 3000X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Penn Battle III 6000X is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Delphin BRONZ and Penn Battle III?
Penn Battle III 6000X
- Designed with a light drag at 5 out of 10 (11,3kg / 24,91lbs), the reel is perfect when you're going after small fish or using ultralight setups
- A high retrieve rate of 9.9 out of 10 (104 centimeter / 40.94 inch), means the reel is made just for speed, perfect for speed fishing or covering water quickly
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Daiwa RX LT 2000X vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 5000-CX


Daiwa Freams LT 6000D-HX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 5000-CX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT5000-CX vs Shimano Sahara 500 FI


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 5000-CX vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 3000-CX


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 4000 HGX vs Shimano Sedona 6000 FI


Shimano Catana FE 1000X vs Daiwa Freams LT 6000D-HX


Daiwa Freams LT 6000D-HX vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2000-XHX


Daiwa Ninja LT 2500DX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT5000-CX


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CXHX


Shimano Sedona 6000 FI vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT5000-CX


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2000-XHX vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 5000-CX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT5000-CX vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 4000 HGX


Shimano Catana FE 1000X vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT3000-CXHX


Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 2500X vs Daiwa Ninja LT 2500DX


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CXHX vs Shimano Sedona 6000 FI


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 5000-CX vs Shimano Catana FE 1000X


Daiwa Ninja LT 2500DX vs Abu GARCIA Revo MGX 20 SP/LX


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CXHX vs Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 2500X


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CXHX vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 3000-CX
