Delphin BRONZ 4000X vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000-CX

Delphin BRONZ
Spinning
51.30 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.18 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag0lbs
Weight245g / 8.64oz
Line retireve per crank-
Ball bearings2
Technical Specifications
- BrandDELPHIN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €15.95
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.22/315

Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT
Spinning
78.10 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classMedium
Durability7.69 out of 10
Ergonomics6.32 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight205g / 7.23oz
Line retireve per crank80 centimeter / 31.5 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €89.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3000-C
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.23/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000-CX clearly outshines Delphin BRONZ 4000X, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (10kg / 22,05lbs) and line retrieve per crank (80 centimeter / 31.5 inch). While Delphin BRONZ 4000X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000-CX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Delphin BRONZ and Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT?
Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000-CX
- With a great drag score 9.6 out of 10 (10kg / 22,05lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- 6.43 out of 10 (80 centimeter / 31.5 inch) in line retrieve, means the reel delivers a steady and reliable retrieve which is ideal for most everyday techniques
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 1000X vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000-CXHX


Shimano Sedona FJ 4000FJX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT6000X


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 2500-XHX vs Shimano Sedona FJ 4000FJX


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CXHX vs Shimano Sedona C3000 HG FI


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 1000D(U)X vs Shimano Sedona 2500 HG FI


Shimano Sedona FJ 4000FJX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 2000SFEX


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 1000X vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT PC 2500X


Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 5000D-C 5000D-CX vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 1000X


Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 5000D-C 5000D-CX vs Shimano Sedona C3000 HG FI


Shimano Sedona FJ 4000FJX vs Daiwa Ninja LT 5000-CX


Daiwa Ninja LT 5000-CX vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 1000D(U)X


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 2500X vs Daiwa Ninja LT 5000-CX


Shimano Sedona FJ 4000FJX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000-CXHX


Shimano Vanquish FC C3000XGCX vs Shimano Sedona 2500 HG FI


Shimano Twin Power FE 2000SFEX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CXHX


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000-CXHX vs Shimano Sedona 2500 HG FI


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 1000X vs Daiwa BG 6500X


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 2500-XHX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT6000X


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000-CXHX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 2000SFEX


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CXHX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000-CXHX
