Delphin BRONZ 4000X vs Daiwa Lexa E LT 19 3000X

Delphin BRONZ
Spinning
51.30 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.18 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag0lbs
Weight245g / 8.64oz
Line retireve per crank-
Ball bearings2
Technical Specifications
- BrandDELPHIN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €15.95
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.22/315

Daiwa Lexa E LT 19
Spinning
3000x
86.50 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.13 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight260g / 9.17oz
Line retireve per crank77 centimeter / 30.31 inch
Ball bearings5
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €129.00
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.23/150
Conclusion
Daiwa Lexa E LT 19 3000X clearly outshines Delphin BRONZ 4000X, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (10kg / 22,05lbs) and line retrieve per crank (77 centimeter / 30.31 inch). While Delphin BRONZ 4000X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa Lexa E LT 19 3000X is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Delphin BRONZ and Daiwa Lexa E LT 19?
Daiwa Lexa E LT 19 3000X
- With a great drag score 9.6 out of 10 (10kg / 22,05lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- 6 out of 10 (77 centimeter / 30.31 inch) in line retrieve, means the reel delivers a steady and reliable retrieve which is ideal for most everyday techniques
- Landing a score of 8 out of 10 (5) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2500X


Shimano Catana FE 4000X vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2500X


Daiwa BG 2500X vs Shimano Catana FE 4000X


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT3000-CXHX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2500X


Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT PC 2500-HX vs Daiwa BG 2500X


Shimano Sedona 6000 FI vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 2500X-HX


Daiwa RX LT 2000X vs Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 2500X


Shimano Vanquish FC C3000MHGCX vs Shimano Twin Power XD A 4000 XGX


Shimano Twin Power XD A 4000 XGX vs Shimano Catana FE 4000X


Shimano Vanford FA C2500SAX vs Shimano Vanquish FC C3000MHGCX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT3000-CXHX vs Shimano Catana 3000 SRC


Shimano Sienna 1000X vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500DX


Shimano 21 Sahara FJ 2500SHGFJX vs Shimano Sedona 6000 FI


Shimano Catana 3000 SRC vs Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 2500X


Daiwa 20 Airity LT 2500X-HX vs Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 2500X vs Shimano Twin Power XD A 4000 XGX


Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 2500X vs Shimano Catana FE 4000X


Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500DX vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 2500D-XHX


Shimano Complex XR 2500X vs Shimano 21 Sahara FJ 2500SHGFJX


Shimano Sedona 6000 FI vs Daiwa BG 2500X
