Delphin BRONZ 4000X vs Shimano AERO XR C5000X
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Delphin BRONZ
Spinning
51.30 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.18 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag0lbs
Weight245g / 8.64oz
Line retireve per crank-
Ball bearings2
Technical Specifications
- BrandDELPHIN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €15.95
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.22/315

Shimano AERO XR
Feeder And Match
79.20 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.09 out of 10
Gear ratio4.7
Maximum drag11kg / 24.25lbs
Weight250g / 8.82oz
Line retireve per crank80 centimeter / 31.5 inch
Ball bearings5+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelFeeder and match
- Price range~ €125.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizeC5000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.4/120
Conclusion
Shimano AERO XR C5000X clearly outshines Delphin BRONZ 4000X, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (11kg / 24,25lbs) and line retrieve per crank (80 centimeter / 31.5 inch). While Delphin BRONZ 4000X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Shimano AERO XR C5000X is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Delphin BRONZ and Shimano AERO XR?
Shimano AERO XR C5000X
- With a maximum drag of 10 out of 10 (11kg / 24,25lbs), this reel offers excellent stopping power, giving fishermen the confidence to handle pressure situations with ease
- This reel provides steady retrieval 80 centimeter / 31.5 inch (6.43 out of 10), good enough for most feeder and match scenarios
- Rated at 8.67 out of 10 (5+1) for ball bearings, this reel provides smooth and consistent performance.. great for active match anglers
Similar comparisons

Shimano Catana FE 4000 HGX vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 3012X


Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 3012X vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 2000X


Penn Battle III Long Cast 8000 LCX vs Mitchell 308 PRO 2000X


Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 6000SSX vs Penn Battle III 3000X


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 2000X vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 4010 / Single crankX


Penn Battle III 3000X vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Feeder LT 6000-SS (Feeder)X


Penn Battle III Long Cast 8000 LCX vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 2000X


Daiwa 18 Ninja Feeder LT 6000-SS (Feeder)X vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 2000X vs Shimano Catana FE 4000 HGX


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 2000X vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 2000X


Penn Battle III Long Cast 8000 LCX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 2000X


Shimano Catana FE 4000 HGX vs Daiwa Nzon Distance 25


Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 4010 / Single crankX


Daiwa 18 Ninja Feeder LT 6000-SS (Feeder)X vs Daiwa Nzon Distance 25


Daiwa BG 3500X vs Daiwa TD Match 3012X


Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 2000X


Daiwa TD Match 3012X vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 2000X


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 1000D(U)X vs Daiwa Nzon Distance 25


Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 3012X vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 4010 / Single crankX
