Delphin BRONZ 4000X vs Shimano Sahara FJ 2500X

Delphin BRONZ
Spinning
51.30 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.18 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag0lbs
Weight245g / 8.64oz
Line retireve per crank-
Ball bearings2
Technical Specifications
- BrandDELPHIN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €15.95
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.22/315

Shimano Sahara FJ
Spinning
65.40 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability7 out of 10
Ergonomics6.2 out of 10
Gear ratio5.0:1
Maximum drag9kg / 19.84lbs
Weight240g / 8.47oz
Line retireve per crank73 centimeter / 28.74 inch
Ball bearings4+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €63.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.25/160
Conclusion
Shimano Sahara FJ 2500X edges out Delphin BRONZ 4000X with slightly better overall performance, especially on the maximum drag (9kg / 19,84lbs) and the line retrieve per crank (73 centimeter / 28.74 inch). Still, Delphin BRONZ 4000X holds its own with strengths like a gear ratio of 5.2:1, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Delphin BRONZ and Shimano Sahara FJ?
Shimano Sahara FJ 2500X
- With a great drag score 9.2 out of 10 (9kg / 19,84lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- When it comes to retrieve speed, a score of 5.43 out of 10 (73 centimeter / 28.74 inch) means slower line pickup, great when you need more control for slower fishing styles
- Landing a score of 8 out of 10 (4+1) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2000X vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CX


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 4000-CX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 2500FEX


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CX vs Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 2000D-XH 2000D-XHX


Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 4000X vs Shimano Exsence C 3000 MHGAX


Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 2500D-XHX vs Daiwa 20 Luvias LT 3000D-CX


Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 4000D-CX vs Shimano Sahara 4000 DH R


Daiwa 19 Certate 3000DX vs Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 4000D-CX


Shimano 21 Sustain 4000 FJX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CX


Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 4000-CX vs Mitchell 308 2000X


Daiwa 20 Luvias LT 3000D-CX vs Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 4000D-CX


Shimano Sahara 4000 DH R vs Shimano Twin Power FE 2500FEX


Shimano Exsence C 3000 MHGAX vs Shimano Catana 2500 RC


Daiwa 19 Certate 3000DX vs Shimano Catana 2500 RC


Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 4000X vs Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 4000X vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CX


Shimano Catana 2500 RC vs Shimano Catana FE 4000X


Shimano Catana FE 4000X vs Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 4000-CX


Shimano Catana FE 4000X vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CX


Daiwa 20 Luvias LT 3000D-CX vs Shimano Sahara 4000 DH R


Shimano 21 Sustain 4000 FJX vs Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 4000X
