Delphin BRONZ 5000X vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 3012X
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Delphin BRONZ
Spinning
51.10 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.15 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag0lbs
Weight254g / 8.96oz
Line retireve per crank-
Ball bearings2
Technical Specifications
- BrandDELPHIN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €16.95
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size5000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.24/310

Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD
Feeder And Match
95.00 out of 100
Value for money5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.5 out of 10
Ergonomics5.93 out of 10
Gear ratio4.7:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight305g / 10.76oz
Line retireve per crank79 centimeter / 31.1 inch
Ball bearings8
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelFeeder and match
- Price range~ €189.00
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3012
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 3012X clearly outshines Delphin BRONZ 5000X, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (12kg / 26,46lbs) and line retrieve per crank (79 centimeter / 31.1 inch). While Delphin BRONZ 5000X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 3012X is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Delphin BRONZ and Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD?
Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 3012X
- With a maximum drag of 10 out of 10 (12kg / 26,46lbs), this reel offers excellent stopping power, giving fishermen the confidence to handle pressure situations with ease
- This reel provides steady retrieval 79 centimeter / 31.1 inch (6.29 out of 10), good enough for most feeder and match scenarios
- With a ball bearing score of 10 out of 10 (8), this reel feels exceptionally smooth and responsive, an ideal choice for demanding feeder and match fishing
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 2500X vs Shimano Sedona 2500 HG FI


Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa TD Match 4012X


Delphin RAYA body vs Shimano Sedona 2500 HG FI


Daiwa 18 Ninja Match and Feeder LT 4000-C (Match and Feeder)X vs Delphin REDIX


Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT 2000 S-XHX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 3000-CX


Shimano Ultegra C2500SHGDX vs Daiwa 19 Certate 2500DX


Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Single crankX vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 2500X


Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 5000-CPX


Daiwa 19 Certate 2500DX vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Match and Feeder LT 4000-C (Match and Feeder)X


Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 5000-CPX vs Daiwa 19 Certate 2500DX


Shimano Ultegra C2500SHGDX vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 2508X


Shimano AERO XR C3000X vs Shimano 21 Sahara FJ 2500SHGFJX


Daiwa 19 Certate 2500DX vs Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 5000-CPX


Shimano Sedona 2500 HG FI vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 2500X


Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 2500X vs Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 2500X


Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 5000-CPX vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Match and Feeder LT 4000-C (Match and Feeder)X


Shimano AERO XR C3000X vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 2508X


Delphin RAYA body vs Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 2500X


Shimano Ultegra C2500SHGDX vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX


Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT 2000 S-XHX vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 2508X
