Delphin BRONZ 5000X vs Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Delphin BRONZ
Spinning
51.10 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.15 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag0lbs
Weight254g / 8.96oz
Line retireve per crank-
Ball bearings2
Technical Specifications
- BrandDELPHIN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €16.95
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size5000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.24/310

Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD
Feeder And Match
87.30 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.5 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio4.7:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight430g / 15.17oz
Line retireve per crank96 centimeter / 37.8 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelFeeder and match
- Price range~ €209.80
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size-
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD clearly outshines Delphin BRONZ 5000X, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (12kg / 26,46lbs) and line retrieve per crank (96 centimeter / 37.8 inch). While Delphin BRONZ 5000X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Delphin BRONZ and Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD?
Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD
- With a maximum drag of 10 out of 10 (12kg / 26,46lbs), this reel offers excellent stopping power, giving fishermen the confidence to handle pressure situations with ease
- With 9.1 out of 10 score (96 centimeter / 37.8 inch) (line retrieve), this reel excels in speed which makes it perfect for rapid match fishing where every second counts
- A ball bearing score of 7 out of 10 (4), makes this reel runs fairly smooth, offering reliable fishing for general feeder and match cases
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 3012X vs Shimano Sedona 2500 HG FI


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CXHX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 5000-CPX vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000-CX


Shimano Sahara FJ 4000X vs Delphin RAYA body


Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 3012X vs Shimano Vanford FA C3000XGAX


Daiwa TD Match 4012X vs Shimano Vanford FA C3000AX


Shimano AERO XR C5000X vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Feeder LT 6000-SS (Feeder)X


Shimano Sahara FJ 4000X vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 1000DX


Daiwa 18 Ninja Feeder LT 6000-SS (Feeder)X vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 3012X


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 1000DX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 18 Ninja Feeder LT 6000-SS (Feeder)X vs Daiwa 24 TDR QD 2508QDX


Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 3012X vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000-CX


Shimano 21 Sustain 4000 HGFJX vs Shimano Vanford FA C3000AX


Shimano AERO XR C5000X vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000-CX


Delphin RAYA body vs Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD


Shimano AERO XR C5000X vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 3000-CX


Shimano Vanford FA C3000AX vs Shimano Sahara FJ 4000X


Shimano Vanford FA C3000AX vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa TD Match 4012X


Shimano Vanford FA C3000AX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 2500-XHX
