Delphin BRONZ 6000X vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000D-CX

Delphin BRONZ
Spinning
34.20 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.5 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.0:1
Maximum drag0lbs
Weight346g / 12.2oz
Line retireve per crank-
Ball bearings2
Technical Specifications
- BrandDELPHIN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €17.95
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size6000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.26/350

Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT
Spinning
82.70 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.62 out of 10
Ergonomics6.32 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight205g / 7.23oz
Line retireve per crank77 centimeter / 30.31 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €185.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3000D-C
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.33/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000D-CX clearly outshines Delphin BRONZ 6000X, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (10kg / 22,05lbs) and line retrieve per crank (77 centimeter / 30.31 inch). While Delphin BRONZ 6000X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000D-CX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Delphin BRONZ and Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT?
Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000D-CX
- With a great drag score 9.6 out of 10 (10kg / 22,05lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- With a score like 8.63 out of 10 (205g / 7,23oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- 6 out of 10 (77 centimeter / 30.31 inch) in line retrieve, means the reel delivers a steady and reliable retrieve which is ideal for most everyday techniques
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 23 Revros LT 4000-CXHX vs Shimano Aero C5000X


Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 3000D-CX vs Shimano FX 2500 HG FCX


Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 3000-CXHX vs Shimano Aero C5000X


Shimano 20 Stella 4000 XGX vs Shimano Vanford FA C2500SAX


Shimano Vanford FA C2500SAX vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 3000X


Shimano Twin Power FD 1000X vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 4000-CXHX


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 4000D-CXHX vs Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 3000-CXHX


Daiwa BG 1500X vs Shimano 21 Sustain 3000 HGFJX


Daiwa BG 1500X vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 2000X


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 4000-CPX vs Shimano Aero C5000X


Shimano 20 Stella 4000 XGX vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 2000X


Shimano Aero C5000X vs Shimano Vanford FA C2500SAX


Shimano 20 Stella 4000 XGX vs Shimano Twin Power XD A C 3000 HGX


Shimano Vanford FA C2500SAX vs Shimano 21 Sustain 3000 HGFJX


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 3000X vs Shimano Twin Power FD 1000X


Shimano 20 Stella 4000 XGX vs Shimano 21 Sustain 3000 HGFJX


Shimano 21 Sahara FJ C3000HGFJX vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 2000X


Shimano Sahara FJ 4000 XGX vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 4000D-CXHX


Shimano Twin Power XD A C 3000 HGX vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 4000D-CXHX


Shimano Sahara FJ 4000 XGX vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 4000-CXHX
