Delphin BRONZ 6000X vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 4000D-CX

Delphin BRONZ
Spinning
34.20 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.5 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.0:1
Maximum drag0lbs
Weight346g / 12.2oz
Line retireve per crank-
Ball bearings2
Technical Specifications
- BrandDELPHIN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €17.95
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size6000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.26/350

Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT
Spinning
84.00 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.65 out of 10
Ergonomics6.23 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight230g / 8.11oz
Line retireve per crank82 centimeter / 32.28 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €195.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000D-C
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.37/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 4000D-CX clearly outshines Delphin BRONZ 6000X, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (12kg / 26,46lbs) and line retrieve per crank (82 centimeter / 32.28 inch). While Delphin BRONZ 6000X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 4000D-CX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Delphin BRONZ and Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT?
Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 4000D-CX
- With a great drag score 10 out of 10 (12kg / 26,46lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- With a score like 8.47 out of 10 (230g / 8,11oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- 6.71 out of 10 (82 centimeter / 32.28 inch) in line retrieve, means the reel delivers a steady and reliable retrieve which is ideal for most everyday techniques
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 4000-CXHX vs Penn Battle III 8000 HSX


Daiwa Sweepfire E 2500C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 2000DX


Penn FIERCE IV 3000X vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000D-CX


Penn Battle III 8000 HSX vs Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 4000X


Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 4000X vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000D-CX


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 2500-XHX vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 4000-CXHX


Daiwa Sweepfire E 2500C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Shimano Twin Power FE 4000MHGFEX


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 2000DX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 2500-XHX


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 3000-CXHX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 3000FEX


Shimano Twin Power FE 3000FEX vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 4000-CXHX


Daiwa Sweepfire E 2500C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Shimano Twin Power XD A 4000 XGX


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) FC 2500X vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 2500C - Spinning reel with front drag


Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 4000X vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 3000CXHX


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 4000-CXHX vs Penn FIERCE IV 3000X


Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QR 750X vs Shimano Exsence C 3000 MHGAX


Shimano Sahara FJ 500X vs Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 3000-CXHX


Daiwa 20 Airity LT 3000CXHX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 5000XGFEX


Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QR 750X vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 2500-XHX


Shimano Sahara FJ 500X vs Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QR 750X


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) FC 2500X vs Penn Battle III 8000 HSX
