Delphin BRONZ 6000X vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500-XHX

Delphin BRONZ
Spinning
34.20 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.5 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.0:1
Maximum drag0lbs
Weight346g / 12.2oz
Line retireve per crank-
Ball bearings2
Technical Specifications
- BrandDELPHIN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €17.95
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size6000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.26/350

Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ)
Spinning
95.00 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.54 out of 10
Ergonomics6.35 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight195g / 6.88oz
Line retireve per crank87 centimeter / 34.25 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €163.20
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500-XH
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.2/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500-XHX clearly outshines Delphin BRONZ 6000X, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (10kg / 22,05lbs) and line retrieve per crank (87 centimeter / 34.25 inch). While Delphin BRONZ 6000X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500-XHX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Delphin BRONZ and Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ)?
Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500-XHX
- With a great drag score 9.6 out of 10 (10kg / 22,05lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- With a score like 8.7 out of 10 (195g / 6,88oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- 8.2 out of 10 (87 centimeter / 34.25 inch) in line retrieve, means it picks up line fast, very handy when chasing quick fish
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 5000D-CX


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2000X vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 1000X


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT5000-CX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 1000X vs Shimano Twin Power FD 4000PGX


Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 1000X vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 5000D-CX


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 1000X vs Abu GARCIA Zenon 1000 SX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 5000D-CX vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2500-XHX


Daiwa 20 Airity LT 3000CXHX vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2500-XHX


Daiwa BG 3500X vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 3000CXHX


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 3000-CXHX vs Shimano Sahara FJ C 5000 XGX


Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 2000X vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 5000D-CX


Shimano Twin Power FD 4000PGX vs Daiwa 21 Presso LT 2000 SS-PX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 4000-C / JB4 0.25MM YELLOW 4000-CX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT5000-CX


Daiwa 20 Airity LT 3000CXHX vs Daiwa BG 3500X


Shimano Sahara FJ C 5000 XGX vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 3000-CXHX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 4000-C / JB4 0.25MM YELLOW 4000-CX vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 3000-CXHX


Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 1000X vs Abu GARCIA Zenon 1000 SX


Daiwa BG 3500X vs Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 1000X


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000-CX vs Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 2000X


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 1000X vs Abu GARCIA Zenon 1000 SX
