Delphin BRONZ 6000X vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CX

Delphin BRONZ
Spinning
34.20 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.5 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.0:1
Maximum drag0lbs
Weight346g / 12.2oz
Line retireve per crank-
Ball bearings2
Technical Specifications
- BrandDELPHIN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €17.95
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size6000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.26/350

Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ)
Spinning
89.70 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.58 out of 10
Ergonomics6.23 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight230g / 8.11oz
Line retireve per crank82 centimeter / 32.28 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €175.50
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000D-C
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.37/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CX clearly outshines Delphin BRONZ 6000X, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (12kg / 26,46lbs) and line retrieve per crank (82 centimeter / 32.28 inch). While Delphin BRONZ 6000X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Delphin BRONZ and Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ)?
Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CX
- With a great drag score 10 out of 10 (12kg / 26,46lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- With a score like 8.47 out of 10 (230g / 8,11oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- 6.71 out of 10 (82 centimeter / 32.28 inch) in line retrieve, means the reel delivers a steady and reliable retrieve which is ideal for most everyday techniques
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Shimano Complex XR 2500X vs Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT4000-CX vs Daiwa RX LT 2500X


Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 2000X


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 2000X vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 5000-C(U)X


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT4000-CX vs Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 2500D-XHX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CPX


Daiwa BG 4500X vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 2500D-XHX


Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 2500D-XH 2500D-XHX vs Shimano Vanford FA C3000AX


Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 3000X vs Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 2500D-XH 2500D-XHX


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 2000X vs Shimano Vanquish FC C3000MHGCX


Daiwa BG 4500X vs Shimano Stella FK 4000 MX


Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 4000-CPX


Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 3000X vs Daiwa RX LT 2500X


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CPX vs Shimano Complex XR 2500X


Daiwa Freams LT 2500DX vs Daiwa BG 4500X


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 5000-CX vs Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 3000-CX


Daiwa RX LT 2500X vs Shimano Complex XR 2500X


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 5000-CX vs Daiwa Freams LT 2500DX


Daiwa Sweepfire E 1500C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 3000X


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 5000-C(U)X vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 2500D-XHX
