Delphin BRONZ 6000X vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000D-CX

Delphin BRONZ
Spinning
34.20 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.5 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.0:1
Maximum drag0lbs
Weight346g / 12.2oz
Line retireve per crank-
Ball bearings2
Technical Specifications
- BrandDELPHIN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €17.95
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size6000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.26/350

Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT
Spinning
78.10 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classMedium
Durability7.69 out of 10
Ergonomics6.32 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight205g / 7.23oz
Line retireve per crank80 centimeter / 31.5 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €89.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3000D-C
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.33/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000D-CX clearly outshines Delphin BRONZ 6000X, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (10kg / 22,05lbs) and line retrieve per crank (80 centimeter / 31.5 inch). While Delphin BRONZ 6000X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000D-CX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Delphin BRONZ and Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT?
Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000D-CX
- With a great drag score 9.6 out of 10 (10kg / 22,05lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- With a score like 8.63 out of 10 (205g / 7,23oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- 6.43 out of 10 (80 centimeter / 31.5 inch) in line retrieve, means the reel delivers a steady and reliable retrieve which is ideal for most everyday techniques
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 2500-XHX vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 4000-C(U)X


Shimano Sedona 2500 HG FI vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 4000-CX


Penn Battle III 3000X vs Daiwa Ninja LT 2500DX


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 2500-XHX vs Shimano Sedona 2500 HG FI


Shimano Stella FK 2500 HGX vs Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 3000-CX


Shimano Stella FK 2500 HGX vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 2000DX


Delphin INKS 4000X vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 2500-XHX


Shimano Sedona FJ C2000SHGFJX vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 4000-C(U)X


Shimano Sedona 2500 HG FI vs Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 1000X


Daiwa Ninja LT 2500DX vs Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 1000X


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT PC 2500DX vs Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 3000-CX


Shimano Complex XR 2500X vs Delphin ELIXIR 5000X


Shimano Sedona FJ C2000SHGFJX vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT PC 2500DX


Shimano Twin Power FE 2500FEX vs Shimano Stella FK 2500 HGX


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 4000-CX vs Delphin INKS 4000X


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 4000-CX vs Mitchell 308 PRO 2000X


Penn Battle III 3000X vs Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 1000X


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 2000DX


Daiwa 20 Airity LT 2000DX vs Shimano Sedona 2500 HG FI


Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 3000-CX vs Penn Battle III 3000X
