Delphin BRONZ 6000X vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 4000-CX

Delphin BRONZ
Spinning
34.20 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.5 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.0:1
Maximum drag0lbs
Weight346g / 12.2oz
Line retireve per crank-
Ball bearings2
Technical Specifications
- BrandDELPHIN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €17.95
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size6000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.26/350

Daiwa 23 Revros LT
Spinning
63.10 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability3 out of 10
Ergonomics6.1 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight270g / 9.52oz
Line retireve per crank82 centimeter / 32.28 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €56.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000-C
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 23 Revros LT 4000-CX clearly outshines Delphin BRONZ 6000X, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (10kg / 22,05lbs) and line retrieve per crank (82 centimeter / 32.28 inch). While Delphin BRONZ 6000X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 23 Revros LT 4000-CX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Delphin BRONZ and Daiwa 23 Revros LT?
Daiwa 23 Revros LT 4000-CX
- With a great drag score 9.6 out of 10 (10kg / 22,05lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- With a score like 8.2 out of 10 (270g / 9,52oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- 6.71 out of 10 (82 centimeter / 32.28 inch) in line retrieve, means the reel delivers a steady and reliable retrieve which is ideal for most everyday techniques
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (4) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000-XHX vs Shimano Sedona 6000 FI


Shimano Ultegra C3000HGDX vs Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 4000-CX


Shimano Ultegra C3000HGDX vs Shimano Vanford FA 2500SHGAX


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 6000X vs Shimano Sahara 4000 R


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 6000X vs Shimano Vanford FA C3000SDHAX


Daiwa Freams LT 3000D-CX vs Shimano Ultegra C2000SHGDX


Shimano Vanford FA C3000HGAX vs Shimano Sedona 6000 FI


Shimano Ultegra C2000SHGDX vs Shimano Vanford FA C3000HGAX


Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 1500C - Spinning reel with front drag


Shimano Ultegra C2000SHGDX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 3000-CX


Shimano Sahara 4000 R vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 1500C - Spinning reel with front drag


Shimano Vanford FA 2500SHGAX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000-XHX


Daiwa GS LTD 3000X vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2000-XHX


Shimano Sahara 4000 R vs Shimano Vanford FA 2500SHGAX


Shimano Stella FK C 3000 M HGX vs Shimano Ultegra C3000HGDX


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 3000-CX vs Shimano Stradic FM 1000FMX


Daiwa Freams LT 3000D-CX vs Shimano Ultegra C3000HGDX


Shimano Stella FK C 3000 M HGX vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 1500C - Spinning reel with front drag


Daiwa GS LTD 3000X vs Shimano Ultegra C2000SHGDX


Shimano Sahara 4000 R vs Daiwa Freams LT 3000D-CX
