Delphin BRONZ 6000X vs Daiwa Ninja LT 4000-CX

Delphin BRONZ
Spinning
34.20 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.5 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.0:1
Maximum drag0lbs
Weight346g / 12.2oz
Line retireve per crank-
Ball bearings2
Technical Specifications
- BrandDELPHIN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €17.95
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size6000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.26/350

Daiwa Ninja LT
Spinning
63.50 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.9 out of 10
Ergonomics6.07 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight280g / 9.88oz
Line retireve per crank82 centimeter / 32.28 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €44.00
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000-C
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150
Conclusion
Daiwa Ninja LT 4000-CX clearly outshines Delphin BRONZ 6000X, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (12kg / 26,46lbs) and line retrieve per crank (82 centimeter / 32.28 inch). While Delphin BRONZ 6000X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa Ninja LT 4000-CX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Delphin BRONZ and Daiwa Ninja LT?
Daiwa Ninja LT 4000-CX
- With a great drag score 10 out of 10 (12kg / 26,46lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- With a score like 8.13 out of 10 (280g / 9,88oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- 6.71 out of 10 (82 centimeter / 32.28 inch) in line retrieve, means the reel delivers a steady and reliable retrieve which is ideal for most everyday techniques
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (4) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Similar comparisons

Delphin INKS 5000X vs Shimano Vanquish FC 4000MHGCX


Shimano Exsence 4000 MXGAX vs Shimano Ultegra C2000SDX


Shimano Aero C3000X vs Shimano 21 Sustain 2500 HGFJX


Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QC 750X vs Daiwa Freams LT 3000X


Delphin INKS 5000X vs Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 2500 / JB4 0.17MM YELLOW 2500X vs Shimano Aero C3000X


Shimano Sahara FJ C 3000X vs Shimano Vanquish FC 4000MHGCX


Daiwa Freams LT 3000X vs Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 3000-CX


Shimano Sahara FJ C 3000X vs Shimano Aero C3000X


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000-CX vs Shimano Vanquish FC 2500SCX


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa Freams LT 3000X


Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QC 750X vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 5000D-CXHX


Shimano Catana FE 4000X vs Penn Battle III Long Cast 8000 LCX


Shimano Exsence 4000 MXGAX vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000-CX vs Shimano Aero C3000X


Shimano Vanquish FC 2500SCX vs Shimano Aero C5000X


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500DX vs Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 3000-CX


Shimano Catana FE 4000X vs Shimano Sahara FJ C 3000X


Shimano Ultegra C2000SDX vs Daiwa Freams LT 3000X


Shimano Sahara FJ C 3000X vs Shimano Catana FE 4000X
